CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21Spacecraft Design and TechnologySpace Satellite Systems and ControlSpacecraft Dynamics and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Power budget analysis for a LEO polar orbiting nano-satellite

Dahbi, Sanae, Aziz, Abdelhak, Zouggar, Smail, Hafyani, Mohamed El, Morocco, Oujda, Hanafi, Ahmed, Karim, Mohammed, Latachi, Ibtissam, Rachidi, Tajjeeddine·2017·2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP)
DOI 10.1109/atsip.2017.8075580
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In April 2014, a nano-satellite project was initiated at the University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco in order to give graduate students the rare opportunity to experience all the challenging aspects associated with satellite design, manufacture, launch and operation. The nano-satellite follows the design concept of a 1U CubeSat, which has the shape of a cube of 10cm3edge, of 1.33kg mass and which consumes a power of 1W. The initial orbital parameters of the nano-satellite were set to a circular sun-synchronous Low Earth Orbit (LEO) with an inclination of 90°. The operation time was set to two years. To ensure a successful flight, it is necessary, within the scope of the project, to establish an adequate power budget to ensure that the consumed power on board does not exceed the produced power. In this work we analyze deeply the available energy required per single orbit, and summarize the estimated produced and consumed power for several operation modes of the nanosatellite in the execution of its mission.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/atsip.2017.8075580

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. chariet, 2014, Ingénierie Système sur le Nanosatellite IGOsat, Phase A, University Paris-Diderot, 37
  2. despont, 2006, S3-A-SET-1-0-System_Engineering Space center Lausanne Switzerland, 17
  3. 0, Azur Space Solar Power GmbH 30% Triple Junction GaAs Solar Cell
  4. beukelaers, 2009, From mission analysis to space flight simulation of the OUFTI-1 nano-satellite, 20
  5. ahmed, 2015, Document des Exigences Système - version 1 0 Fès, 10
  6. thirion, 2009, Design and Implementation of the Electrical Power System of student nanosatellite oufti-1, 106
  7. mehrparvar, 2014, Cube Sat Design Specification 13 rev California Polytechnic state university

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dahbi, S., Aziz, A., Zouggar, S., Hafyani, M. E., Morocco, O., Hanafi, A., Karim, M., Latachi, I., & Rachidi, T.
Affiliations
Al Akhawayn University (MA)
ORCID
Venue
2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-05
Pages
1-6
DOI
10.1109/atsip.2017.8075580
OpenAlex
W2765901493
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Keywords
power budget analysis, CubeSat, nanosatellites, low Earth orbit, polar orbit, sun-synchronous orbit, solar energy, power consumption, satellite mission design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power budget analysis for a LEO polar orbiting nano-satellite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/atsip.2017.8075580
The paper
Dahbi, S., Aziz, A., Zouggar, S., Hafyani, M. E., Morocco, O., Hanafi, A., Karim, M., Latachi, I., & Rachidi, T. (2017). Power budget analysis for a LEO polar orbiting nano-satellite. 2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP). https://doi.org/10.1109/atsip.2017.8075580