Assessment of voltage unbalance due to single phase rooftop photovoltaic panels in residential low voltage distribution network: A study on a real LV network in Western Australia
Abstract
Voltage and current unbalance are common power quality problems in power grids. The penetration of single phase inverter interface photovoltaic panels will impact the voltage profile and voltage unbalance index of Low and Medium voltage distribution network. Due to lack of sufficient monitoring point in the distribution network, an assessment method of evaluating the voltage unbalance index is of paramount importance. Due to stochastic nature of the location and rating of photovoltaic panels, a probabilistic method based on Monte Carlo simulation is proposed to assess the voltage unbalance factor. The simulation is run using MATLAB and PowerFactory, based on proposed data exchange between the two software packages. The effect of the timing mismatch between solar generation and load profile is also studied using a time sweep simulation. The result of simulation shows that there is a low probability that the penetration of photovoltaic panels render the voltage unbalance factor to exceed the limits. However, the variation of solar generation and loads during the day might be of concern, especially during low demands periods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A high number of single-phase LC technologies can increase voltage unbalance in each node and in the entire LV network.
“High number of single-phase LC technologies can increase the voltage unbalance in each node and in the entire LV network.”
From A Comprehensive Analysis of the Voltage Unbalance Factor in PV and EV Rich Non-Synthetic Low Voltage Distribution Networks (2020) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
Effects of unbalanced voltage on the operation performance of a three-phase induction motor
Lee, C.-Y. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · doi:10.1109/60.766984 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antić, T., Capuder, T., & Bolfek, M. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14010117 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“Authors in [26] analyze voltage unbalance in different time periods, while in [29] the voltage unbalance in only one node is analyzed.”
BackgroundHou, Y., Givisiez, A. G., Liu, M. Z., & Ochoa, L. F. (2025) · Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.segan.2024.101615 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kharrazi, A., Sreeram, V., & Mishra, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Venue
- 2017 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-11
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2787792589
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Quality and Harmonics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Keywords
- voltage unbalance, rooftop solar, low-voltage distribution networks, power quality, Monte Carlo simulation, probabilistic analysis, residential distribution networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review