Cited by 49Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTopic Modeling

Generation of Synthetic Electronic Medical Record Text

Open access
Guan, Jiaqi, Li, Runzhe, Yu, Sheng, Zhang, Xuegong·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) have achieved remarkable success in many fields and have brought new opportunities and high expectation in the analyses of medical data. The most common type of medical data is the massive free-text electronic medical records (EMR). It is widely regarded that mining such massive data can bring up important information for improving medical practices as well as for possible new discoveries on complex diseases. However, the free EMR texts are lacking consistent standards, rich of private information, and limited in availability. Also, as they are accumulated from everyday practices, it is often hard to have a balanced number of samples for the types of diseases under study. These problems hinder the development of ML and NLP methods for EMR data analysis. To tackle these problems, we developed a model to generate synthetic text of EMRs called Medical Text Generative Adversarial Network or mtGAN. It is based on the GAN framework and is trained by the REINFORCE algorithm. It takes disease features as inputs and generates synthetic texts as EMRs for the corresponding diseases. We evaluate the model from micro-level, macro-level and application-level on a Chinese EMR text dataset. The results show that the method has a good capacity to fit real data and can generate realistic and diverse EMR samples. This provides a novel way to avoid potential leakage of patient privacy while still supply sufficient well-controlled cohort data for developing downstream ML and NLP methods. It can also be used as a data augmentation method to assist studies based on real EMR data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bibm.2018.8621223

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Wang, K., Chen, R., Fung, B. C., and Yu, P. S. (2010). Privacy- preserving data publishing: A survey on recent developments. ACM Computing Surveys.
  2. El Emam, K., Jonker, E., Arbuckle, L., and Malin, B. (2011). A systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data. PloS one, 6(12), e28071.
  3. Graves, A. (2012). Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  4. Bengio, S., Vinyals, O., Jaitly, N., and Shazeer, N. (2015). Scheduled sampling for sequence prediction with recurrent neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1171-1179).
  5. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... and Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2672-2680).
  6. Yu, L., Zhang, W., Wang, J., and Yu, Y. (2017, March). SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradient. In AAAI (pp. 2852-2858).
  7. Williams, R. J. (1992). Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Machine learning, 8(3-4), 229- 256.
  8. Hochreiter, S., and Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8), 1735-1780.
  9. Li, J., Monroe, W., Shi, T., Jean, S., Ritter, A., and Jurafsky, D. (2017). Adversarial learning for neural dialogue generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06547, unpublished. · arXiv
  10. Williams, R. J., and Zipser, D. (1989). A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks. Neural computation, 1(2), 270-280.
  11. Choi, E., Biswal, S., Malin, B., Duke, J., Stewart, W. F., and Sun, J. (2017, November). Generating Multi-label Discrete Patient Records us- ing Generative Adversarial Networks. In Machine Learning for Health- care Conference (pp. 286-305).
  12. Esteban, C., Hyland, S. L., and Rätsch, G. (2017). Real-valued (medical) time series generation with recurrent conditional GANs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02633, unpublished. · arXiv
  13. Yahi, A., Vanguri, R., Elhadad, N., and Tatonetti, N. P. (2017). Genera- tive Adversarial Networks for Electronic Health Records: A Framework for Exploring and Evaluating Methods for Predicting Drug-Induced Lab- oratory Test Trajectories. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00164, unpublished. · arXiv
  14. Browne, C. B., Powley, E., Whitehouse, D., Lucas, S. M., Cowling, P. I., and Rohlfshagen, P., et al. (2012). A survey of monte carlo tree search methods. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence & Ai in Games, 4(1), 1-43.
  15. Kim, Y. (2014). Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classifi- cation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 1746-1751).
  16. Lu, S., Zhu, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, J., and Yu, Y. (2018). Neural text generation: past, present and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07133, unpublished. · arXiv
  17. Che, T., Li, Y., Zhang, R., Hjelm, R. D., Li, W., Song, Y., and Bengio, Y. (2017). Maximum-likelihood augmented discrete generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.07983, unpublished. · arXiv
  18. Guo, J., Lu, S., Cai, H., Zhang, W., Yu, Y., and Wang, J. (2017). Long text generation via adversarial training with leaked information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.08624, unpublished. · arXiv
  19. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., and Bellemare, M. G., et al. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529.
  20. Zhu, Y., Lu, S., Zheng, L., Guo, J., Zhang, W., and Wang, J., et al. (2018). Texygen: a benchmarking platform for text generation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.01886, unpublished. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guan, J., Li, R., Yu, S., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-12
Pages
374-380
OpenAlex
W2903970876
Cited by
49
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (2018YFC0910404, 11801301, 61721003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
clinical text generation, generative adversarial networks, data augmentation, patient privacy protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review