Cited by 278Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Synthetic data generation for tabular health records: A systematic review

Open access
Hernandez, Mikel, Epelde, Gorka, Alberdi, Ane, Cilla, Rodrigo, Rankin, Debbie·2022·Neurocomputing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.053

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various methods and evaluation metrics are used to assess the privacy dimension of synthetic tabular data generation approaches, including identity disclosure, attribute disclosure, distance to the closest record, membership attack, maximum real-to-synthetic similarity, differential privacy cost, and GANs.

    “Various methods and evaluation metrics are used to assess the privacy dimension of the synthetic tabular data generation approaches. These methods include identity disclosure, attribute disclosure, distance to the closest record, membership attack, maximum real-to-synthetic similarity, differential privacy cost, and GANs.”

    From Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [47]

    Section 6.2.3 (page unavailable) lists identity and attribute disclosure, distance to the closest record, membership attack, maximum real-to-synthetic similarity, and differential privacy cost as privacy-evaluation methods. Sections 6.2 and 6.2.3 treat GANs as approaches being evaluated, not as a privacy-evaluation method, so the final item in the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hernandez et al discuss privacy concerns related to synthetic tabular data generation in health care.

    “Hernandez et al [47] discuss privacy concerns related to synthetic tabular data generation in health care.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, Y. Bengio, Generative adversarial nets, in: Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 27, Curran Associates, Inc., 2014, pp. 2672-2680.
  2. M. S. Donaldson, K. N. Lohr, I. o. M. U. Committee on Regional Health Data, Health Data in the Information Age: Use, Disclosure, and Privacy, National Academies Press (US), 1994, pp. 142-144.
  3. E. Choi, S. Biswal, B. Malin, J. Duke, W. F. Stewart, J. Sun, Generating multi-label discrete patient records using generative adversarial networks, Proceedings of Machine Learning for Healthcare (MLHC) (2018).
  4. J. Vaidya, B. Shafiq, M. Asani, N. Adam, X. Jiang, L. Ohno-Machado, A scalable privacy-preserving data generation methodol- ogy for exploratory analysis, AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2017 (2018) 1695-1704.
  5. A. J. Yale, Privacy Preserving Synthetic Health Data Generation and Evaluation, Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2020. ISBN: 9798662575981 Publication Title: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses 27833340.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernandez, M., Epelde, G., Alberdi, A., Cilla, R., & Rankin, D.
Affiliations
  • Vicomtech (ES)
  • Mondragon Unibertsitatea (ES)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Hernandez, Mikel
  • Epelde, Gorka
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
493
Pages
28-45
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224022798
Cited by
278
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 8
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
synthetic data generation, tabular data generation, healthcare data privacy, generative adversarial networks, synthetic tabular data generation, patient privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review