Lambda architecture for cost-effective batch and speed big data processing
Open accessAbstract
Sensor and smart phone technologies present opportunities for data explosion, streaming and collecting from heterogeneous devices every second. Analyzing these large datasets can unlock multiple behaviors previously unknown, and help optimize approaches to city wide applications or societal use cases. However, collecting and handling of these massive datasets presents challenges in how to perform optimized online data analysis `on-the-fly', as current approaches are often limited by capability, expense and resources. This presents a need for developing new methods for data management particularly using public clouds to minimize cost, network resources and on-demand availability. This paper presents an implementation of the lambda architecture design pattern to construct a data-handling backend on Amazon EC2, providing high throughput, dense and intense data demand delivered as services, minimizing the cost of the network maintenance. This paper combines ideas from database management, cost models, query management and cloud computing to present a general architecture that could be applied in any given scenario where affordable online data processing of Big Datasets is needed. The results are presented with a case study of processing router sensor data on the current ESnet network data as a working example of the approach. The results showcase a reduction in cost and argue benefits for performing online analysis and anomaly detection for sensor data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lambda computing and liquid software paradigms are examples of the flexibility requested for Digital Twin platforms.
“The paradigms of Lambda computing [292] [293] and liquid software [294] are examples of the requested flexibility.”
From Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models (2020) · cites this paper as [292]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- D. Abadi, Data Management in the Cloud: Limitations and Opportunities, IEEE Engineering Bulletin -DEBU , vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3-12, 2009.
- R. Chaiken, B. Jenkins, P.-A. Larson, B. Ramsey, D. Shakib, S. Weaver, and J. Zhou. Scope: Easy and efficient parallel processing of massive data sets. In Proc. of VLDB, 2008
- M. Dikaiakos, G. Pallis, D. Katsaros, P. Mehra, A. Vakali, Cloud Computing: Distributed Internet Computing for IT and Scientific Research, IEEE Internet Computing, 2009.
- I. Foster, Y. Zhao, I. Raicu, S. Lu, Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared Proceedings of the IEEE Grid Computing Environments Workshop, pp. 1-10, 2008.
- T. Jin, C. Tracy, M. Veeraraghavan, Characterization of high-rate large- sized flows, University of Virginia, Master's thesis, 2013, Online: http://www.cs.virginia.edu/events/colloquia/jin.html
- Z. Liu, M. Veeraraghavan, C. Tracy, J. Tie, I. Foster, J. Dennis, J. Hick, W. Yang, On using virtual circuits for GridFTP transfers, Int. Conf. for HPC, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp. 81:1, 2012.
- Y. Lu, M. Wang, B. Prabhakar, F. Bonomi, ElephantTrap: A low cost device for identifying large flows, 15th Annual IEEE Symposium on High-Performance Interconnects, pp. 99-108, 2007.
- C. Olston, B. Reed, U. Srivastava, R. Kumar, A. Tomkins. Pig latin: a not- so-foreign language for data processing, SIGMOD Conference, pgs 1099-1110, 2008.
- S. Sakr, A. Liu, D. M. Batista, M. Alomari, A Survey of Large Scale Data Management Approaches in Cloud Environments. IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials, vol 13, no 3, 2011.
- US DOE Office of Science ASCR, Terabit networks for extreme-scale science workshop report. Available Online: http://science.energy.gov/, 2014.
- S. Sarvotham, R. Riedi, R. Baraniuk, Connection-level analysis and modelling of network traffic, ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, pp. 99-104, 2001.
- P. Xiong, Y. Chi, S. Zhu, H.J. Moon, C. Pu, H. Hacigumus, Intelligent Management of Virtualized Resources for Database Systems in Cloud Environment, In ICDE, 2011.
- N. Mitton, S. Papavassiliou, A. Puliafito, K. S Trivedi, Combining Cloud and sensors in a smart city environment, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, December 2012, 2012:247
- A.M. Aly, A. Sallam, B.M. Gnanasekaran, L. V. Nguyen-Dinh, W.G. Aref, M. Ouzzani, A. Ghafoor, M3: stream processing on main-memory MapReduce, in: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE '12, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2012, pp. 1253-1256.
- T.M. Ghanem, A.K. Elmagarmid, P.-A. Larson, W.G. Aref, Supporting views in data stream management systems, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 35 (2008) 1:1-1:47
- A. Abouzied, K. Bajda-Pawlikowski, J. Huang, D. J. Abadi, and A. Silberschatz. 2010. HadoopDB in action: building real world applications. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. ACM, New York, USA
- Song X-W, Dong Z-Y, Long X-Y, Li S-F, Zuo X-N, Zhu C-Z, et al. (2011) REST: A Toolkit for Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Processing. PLoS ONE 6(9): e25031. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025031 · DOI
- Y. Simmhan, V. Agarwal, S. Aman, A. Kumbhare, S. Natarajan, N. Rajguru, I. Robinson, S. Stevens, W. Yin, Q. Zhou and V. Prasanna, Adaptive Energy Forecasting and Information Diffusion for Smart Power Grids , IEEE International Scalable Computing Challenge (SCALE 2012) , 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models
Minerva, R., Lee, G. M., & Crespi, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.2998530 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kiran, M., Murphy, P., Monga, I., Dugan, J., & Baveja, S. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Bradford (GB)
- Energy Sciences Network (US)
- Netaji Subhas University of Technology (IN)
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-10
- Pages
- 2785-2792
- OpenAlex
- W2213201020
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 13.90
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
- Keywords
- Lambda architecture, big data processing, cloud computing cost optimization, Amazon EC2, ESnet, online data analysis, anomaly detection, sensor data, query management, data management architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review