Cited by 164Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionComputer Science and Engineering

Deep learning in the automotive industry: Applications and tools

Open access
Luckow, Andre, Cook, Matthew, Ashcraft, Nathan, Weill, Edwin, Djerekarov, Emil, Vorster, Bennie·2016·2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)

Abstract

Deep Learning refers to a set of machine learning techniques that utilize neural networks with many hidden layers for tasks, such as image classification, speech recognition, language understanding. Deep learning has been proven to be very effective in these domains and is pervasively used by many Internet services. In this paper, we describe different automotive uses cases for deep learning in particular in the domain of computer vision. We surveys the current state-of-the-art in libraries, tools and infrastructures (e. g. GPUs and clouds) for implementing, training and deploying deep neural networks. We particularly focus on convolutional neural networks and computer vision use cases, such as the visual inspection process in manufacturing plants and the analysis of social media data. To train neural networks, curated and labeled datasets are essential. In particular, both the availability and scope of such datasets is typically very limited. A main contribution of this paper is the creation of an automotive dataset, that allows us to learn and automatically recognize different vehicle properties. We describe an end-to-end deep learning application utilizing a mobile app for data collection and process support, and an Amazon-based cloud backend for storage and training. For training we evaluate the use of cloud and on-premises infrastructures (including multiple GPUs) in conjunction with different neural network architectures and frameworks. We assess both the training times as well as the accuracy of the classifier. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the trained classifier in a real world setting during manufacturing process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bigdata.2016.7841045

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning-based approaches show great advantages in surface defect detection and other industrial applications.

    “deep learning-based approaches show great advantages in both surface defects detection and other industrial applications, such as the automotive industry [2], fruit classification [3], and object detection [4,5].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [56][56] Microsoft. Project Oxford. http://www.projectoxford.ai/, 2015. -
  2. [65][65] Andre Luckow, Ken Kennedy, Fabian Manhardt, Emil Djerekarov, Bennie Vorster, and Amy Apon. Automotive big data: Applications, workloads and infrastructures. In Big Data (Big Data), 2015 IEEE International Conference on , pages 1201-1210, Oct 2015. -
  3. [71][71] Jonathan Krause, Michael Stark, Jia Deng, and Li Fei-Fei. 3d object representations for fine-grained categorization. In 4th IEEE Workshop on 3D Representation and Recognition, at ICCV 2013 . IEEE, 2013. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luckow, A., Cook, M., Ashcraft, N., Weill, E., Djerekarov, E., & Vorster, B.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-12
Pages
3759-3768
OpenAlex
W2583832915
Cited by
164
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
Keywords
convolutional neural networks, computer vision, visual inspection, manufacturing quality control, annotated dataset, GPU training, neural network framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review