Detecting Fake Accounts on Social Media
Abstract
In the present generation, on-Line social networks (OSNs) have become increasingly popular, people's social lives have become more associated with these sites. They use on-Line social networks (OSNs) to keep in touch with each others, share news, organize events, and even run their own e-business. The rapid growth of OSNs and the massive amount of personal data of its subscribers have attracted attackers, and imposters to steal personal data, share false news, and spread malicious activities. On the other hand, researchers have started to investigate efficient techniques to detect abnormal activities and fake accounts relying on accounts features, and classification algorithms. However, some of the account's exploited features have negative contribution in the final results or have no impact, also using standalone classification algorithms does not always achieve satisfactory results. In this paper, a new algorithm, SVM-NN, is proposed to provide efficient detection for fake Twitter accounts and bots, feature selection and dimension reduction techniques were applied. Machine learning classification algorithms were used to decide the target accounts identity real or fake, those algorithms were support vector machine (SVM), neural Network (NN), and our newly developed algorithm, SVM-NN. The proposed algorithm (SVM-NN) uses less number of features, while still being able to correctly classify about 98% of the accounts of our training dataset.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fake accounts contribute to the spread of harmful content and misinformation, which can influence civic belief, generate conflicts, and erode trust in online civilizations.
“Fake accounts pay to the spread of harmful content, and misinformation, which can influence civic belief, generate conflicts, and erode trust in online civilizations.”
From Instagram fake profile detection using an ensemble learning method (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918 · see citing works
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419 · see citing works
Efficient Feature Selection via Analysis of Relevance and Redundancy
Yu, L., & Liu, H. (2004) · Cited by 1,969 · see citing works
Principal components analysis (PCA)
Mackiewicz, A. A., & Ratajczak, W. (1993) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/0098-3004(93)90090-r · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
Toward optimal feature selection
Koller, D., & Sahami, M. (1996) · Cited by 1,436 · see citing works
Diagnosing network-wide traffic anomalies
Lakhina, A., Crovella, M., & Diot, C. (2004) · Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication · doi:10.1145/1015467.1015492 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Feature selection for high-dimensional genomic microarray data
Xing, E. P., Jordan, M. I., & Karp, R. M. (2001) · Cited by 635 · see citing works
A Study on Sigmoid Kernels for SVM and the Training of non-PSD Kernels by SMO-type Methods
Lin, H.-T. (2005) · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Ratkiewicz (2011) · doi:10.1145/1963192.1963301 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Fame for sale: Efficient detection of fake Twitter followers
Cresci, S., Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A., & Tesconi, M. (2015) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.09.003 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Aiding the detection of fake accounts in large scale social online services
Cao, Q., Sirivianos, M., Yang, X., & Pregueiro, T. (2012) · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Boshmaf, Y., Muslukhov, I., Beznosov, K., & Ripeanu, M. (2011) · Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1145/2076732.2076746 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Suspended accounts in retrospect: an analysis of twitter spam
Thomas, K., Grier, C., Song, D., & Paxson, V. (2011) · Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference · doi:10.1145/2068816.2068840 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Algorithms for Large Scale Markov Blanket Discovery
Tsamardinos, I., Aliferis, C., & Statnikov, A. (2003) · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Empirical evaluation and new design for fighting evolving Twitter spammers
Yang, C., Harkreader, R., & Gu, G. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2013.2267732 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Reformulated radial basis neural networks trained by gradient descent
Karayiannis, N. B. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.761725 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
You are how you click: Clickstream analysis for Sybil detection
Wang, G., Konolige, T., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Zheng, H.-T., & Zhao, B. Y. (2013) · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Eberly, L. E. (2007) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_9 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Towards Detecting Anomalous User Behavior in Online Social Networks
Viswanath, B., Gummadi, K. P., Bashir, M. A., Krishnamurthy, B., Crovella, M. E., Guha, S., & Mislove, A. E. (2014) · Cited by 236 · see citing works
PaulVogt, W. (2005) · doi:10.4135/9781412983907.n1234 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Pitts, S. C. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0219 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
SoK: The Evolution of Sybil Defense via Social Networks
Alvisi, L., Clement, A., Epasto, A., Lattanzi, S., & Panconesi, A. (2013) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp.2013.33 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
A survey of data mining and social network analysis based anomaly detection techniques
Kaur, R., & Singh, S. (2015) · Egyptian Informatics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eij.2015.11.004 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Multiple Account Identity Deception Detection in Social Media Using Nonverbal Behavior
Tsikerdekis, M., & Zeadally, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2014.2332820 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Identifying Fake Profiles in LinkedInPreprint
Adikari, S., & Dutta, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.01381 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Íntegro: Leveraging victim prediction for robust fake account detection in large scale OSNs
Boshmaf, Y., Logothetis, D., Siganos, G., Leria, J., Lorenzo, J., Ripeanu, M., Beznosov, K., & Halawa, H. H. (2016) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2016.05.005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Sun, S.-T., Boshmaf, Y., Hawkey, K., & Beznosov, K. (2010) · New Security Paradigms Workshop · doi:10.1145/1900546.1900556 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Factors explaining user loyalty in a social media-based brand community
Potgieter, L. M., & Naidoo, R. (2017) · South African journal of information management · doi:10.4102/sajim.v19i1.744 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Thwarting Fake OSN Accounts by Predicting their Victims
Boshmaf, Y., Ripeanu, M., Beznosov, K., & Santos‐Neto, E. (2015) · ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (AISec) · doi:10.1145/2808769.2808772 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A theoretical review of social media usage by cyber-criminals
Patel, P., Kannoorpatti, K., Shanmugam, B., Azam, S., & Yeo, K. C. (2017) · International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI) · doi:10.1109/iccci.2017.8117694 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Not every friend on a social network can be trusted: Classifying imposters using decision trees
Fong, S. J., Zhuang, Y., & He, J. (2012) · International Conference on Future Generation Communication Technologies (FGCT) · doi:10.1109/fgct.2012.6476584 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fake Profile Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques
Chakraborty, P., Shazan, M. M., Nahid, M., Ahmed, M. K., & Talukder, P. C. (2022) · Journal of Computer and Communications · doi:10.4236/jcc.2022.1010006 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Beyond Text: Multimodal Credibility Assessment Approaches for Online User-Generated Content
Choudhary, M., Chouhan, S. S., & Rathore, S. S. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3673236 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Instagram fake profile detection using an ensemble learning method
Goyal, B., Gill, N. S., Gulia, P., Alduaiji, N., Shukla, P. K., & J, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-03973-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Khaled, S., El-Tazi, N., & Mokhtar, H. M. O.
- Affiliations
- Cairo University (EG)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-12
- Pages
- 3672-3681
- OpenAlex
- W2914186518
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- fake account detection, social bots, Twitter, social networking sites, support vector machine, artificial neural networks, feature selection, dimensionality reduction, account classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
