Towards Semantically Enhanced Digital Twins
Abstract
Digital twins (DTs) are a powerful mechanism for representing complex industrial assets such as oil platforms as digital models. These models can facilitate temporal analyses and computer simulations of assets. In order to enable this, DTs should be able to capture characteristics of an asset as specified by the manufacturer, its state during the run time, as well as how the asset interacts with other assets in a complex system. We argue that semantic technologies and in particular semantic models or ontologies is promising modelling paradigm for DTs. Semantic models allow to capture complex systems in an intuitive fashion, can be written in standardised ontology languages, and come with a wide range of off-the-shelf systems to design, maintain, query, and navigate semantic models. In this work we report our preliminary results on developing a system that would support semantic-based DTs. In particular, we plan to augment the PI System developed by OSIsoft with ontologies and show how the resulting solution can help in simplifying analytical and machine learning routines for DTs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dealing with a constant flux of data makes it also possible to apply Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to IoT systems based on Digital Twin.
“Dealing with a constant flux of data makes it also possible to apply Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to IoT systems based on Digital Twin [51][52][53] [54].”
From Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
Cites
About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing
Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., & Bettenhausen, K. D. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141 · Cited by 1,474 · see citing works
Building digital twins of 3D printing machines
DebRoy, T., Zhang, W., Turner, J., & Babu, S. S. (2017) · Scripta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.005 · Cited by 259 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Digital twins (DTs) have recently gained a considerable attention by the research and industrial communities [45], [10], [50].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models
Minerva, R., Lee, G. M., & Crespi, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.2998530 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kharlamov, E., Martin-Recuerda, F., Perry, B., Cameron, D., Fjellheim, R., & Waaler, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Computas (Norway) (NO)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-12
- Pages
- 4189-4193
- OpenAlex
- W2913207760
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Applied Advanced Technologies
- Keywords
- digital twin, semantic modeling, ontology (information science), semantic technologies, industrial assets, oil platforms, π-systems, machine learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review