Cited by 66Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Autocorrelation-based LSTM-Autoencoder for Anomaly Detection on Time-Series Data

Homayouni, Hajar, Ghosh, Sudipto, Ray, Indrakshi, Gondalia, Shlok, Duggan, Jerry, Kahn, Michael G.·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)

Abstract

Data quality significantly impacts the results of data analytics. Researchers have proposed machine learning based anomaly detection techniques to identify incorrect data. Existing approaches fail to (1) identify the underlying domain constraints violated by the anomalous data, and (2) generate explanations of these violations in a form comprehensible to domain experts. We propose IDEAL, which is an LSTM-Autoencoder based approach that detects anomalies in multivariate time-series data, generates domain constraints, and reports subsequences that violate the constraints as anomalies. We propose an automated autocorrelation-based windowing approach to adjust the network input size, thereby improving the correctness and performance of constraint discovery over manual and brute-force approaches. The anomalies are visualized in a manner comprehensible to domain experts in the form of decision trees extracted from a random forest classifier. Domain experts can then provide feedback to retrain the learning model and improve the accuracy of the process. We evaluate the effectiveness of IDEAL using datasets from Yahoo servers, NASA Shuttle, and Colorado State University Energy Institute. We demonstrate that IDEAL can detect previously known anomalies from these datasets. Using mutation analysis, we show that IDEAL can detect different types of injected faults. We also demonstrate that the accuracy improves after incorporating domain expert feedback.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378192

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1109/ISCO.2017.7855983 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/3097983.3098052 · DOI
  3. bergstra, 2012, Random Search for Hyper-parameter Optimization, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 281
  4. park, 2017, Fundamentals of Probability and Stochastic Processes with Applications to Communications
  5. 10.1109/DEPCOS-RELCOMEX.2006.38 · DOI
  6. bishop, 2011, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
  7. 10.1007/s13347-017-0293-z · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/s10100-017-0479-6 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735594 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/bs.adcom.2018.03.015 · DOI
  11. park, 2018, A MultimodalAnomaly Detector for Robot-Assisted Feeding Using an LSTM-Based Variational Autoencoder, RA-L, 3, 1544
  12. 10.1109/PHM-Paris.2019.00055 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/978-3-642-16248-0_54 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/10618600.2019.1617160 · DOI
  15. adhikari, 2013, An introductory study on time series modeling and forecasting
  16. 10.1109/CCECE.2018.8447597 · DOI
  17. 10.1144/geochem2016-024 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.08.026 · DOI
  19. 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011409 · DOI
  20. 10.1145/3338840.3355641 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_4 · DOI
  22. 10.1145/342009.335388 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870151 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-981-15-3992-3_42 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/DSAA.2016.92 · DOI
  26. 10.1162/neco_a_01199 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/MDM.2018.00029 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/ICCIKE47802.2019.9004325 · DOI
  29. 10.1145/2783258.2788611 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/ICDMW.2015.104 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.004 · DOI
  32. kay, 2015, How Good is 85%? A Survey Tool to Connect Classifier Evaluation to Acceptability of Accuracy, Proc of CHI, 347
  33. 10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.009 · DOI
  34. bishop, 1995, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, 10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1007/978-3-030-03493-1_41 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Homayouni, H., Ghosh, S., Ray, I., Gondalia, S., Duggan, J., & Kahn, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-12-10
Pages
5068-5077
OpenAlex
W3135977745
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
anomaly detection, multivariate time series, LSTM autoencoder, data quality, data cleaning, decision tree, expert feedback, fault injection, ideals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review