Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 69Advanced Graph Neural NetworksAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Higher-order Structure Based Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks

Open access
Yuan, Xu, Zhou, Na, Yu, Shuo, Huang, Huafei, Chen, Zhikui, Xia, Feng·2021·2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)

Abstract

Anomaly detection (such as telecom fraud detection and medical image detection) has attracted the increasing attention of people. The complex interaction between multiple entities widely exists in the network, which can reflect specific human behavior patterns. Such patterns can be modeled by higher-order network structures, thus benefiting anomaly detection on attributed networks. However, due to the lack of an effective mechanism in most existing graph learning methods, these complex interaction patterns fail to be applied in detecting anomalies, hindering the progress of anomaly detection to some extent. In order to address the aforementioned issue, we present a higher-order structure based anomaly detection (GUIDE) method. We exploit attribute autoencoder and structure autoencoder to reconstruct node attributes and higher-order structures, respectively. Moreover, we design a graph attention layer to evaluate the significance of neighbors to nodes through their higher-order structure differences. Finally, we leverage node attribute and higher-order structure reconstruction errors to find anomalies. Extensive experiments on five real-world datasets (i.e., ACM, Citation, Cora, DBLP, and Pubmed) are implemented to verify the effectiveness of GUIDE. Experimental results in terms of ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, and Recall@K show that GUIDE significantly outperforms the state-of-art methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671990

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1145/342009.335388 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/ISI.2007.379473 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1145/3442381.3449821 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/3340531.3417446 · DOI
  6. lee, 2019, Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 499
  7. 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.330112 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/978-3-030-50417-5_22 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100267 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/3018661.3018731 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/2618243.2618266 · DOI
  12. 10.24963/ijcai.2017/299 · DOI
  13. 10.24963/ijcai.2018/488 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/ISCC50000.2020.9219684 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/3336191.3371788 · DOI
  16. 10.1137/1.9781611975673.67 · DOI
  17. 10.1145/3289600.3290964 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8852354 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-3-030-18590-9_19 · DOI
  20. 10.1137/1.9781611974348.24 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508729 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113303 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/3442381.3449849 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105895 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.future.2020.03.004 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/3184558.3186900 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/ISCC.2018.8538524 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/TCSS.2020.2977958 · DOI
  29. 10.3390/s18082491 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/MIS.2020.3042871 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/ICDM.2013.88 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/TAI.2021.3076021 · DOI
  33. 10.24963/ijcai.2017/325 · DOI
  34. li, 2019, Specae: Spectral autoencoder for anomaly detection in attributed networks, Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2233
  35. 10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5409 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053387 · DOI
  37. 10.1145/3340531.3412070 · DOI
  38. kipf, 2016, Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks, ICLR International Conference on Learning Representations
  39. 10.24963/ijcai.2020/179 · DOI
  40. 10.1145/3184558.3191524 · DOI
  41. 10.1145/3383583.3398518 · DOI

Cited by

See all 69

Metadata

Authors
Yuan, X., Zhou, N., Yu, S., Huang, H., Chen, Z., & Xia, F.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Federation University (AU)
Venue
2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-12-15
Pages
2691-2700
OpenAlex
W4205942400
Cited by
69
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
anomaly detection, attributed graphs, higher-order network structure, reconstruction error, node classification, telecom fraud detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Higher-order Structure Based Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671990
The paper
Yuan, X., Zhou, N., Yu, S., Huang, H., Chen, Z., & Xia, F. (2021). Higher-order Structure Based Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671990

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.