Cited by 14Electrical and Bioimpedance TomographyWound Healing and TreatmentsNanomaterials and Printing Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flexible bioimpedance spectroscopy system for wound care monitoring

Mc Caffrey, Colm, Flak, Jacek, Kiri, Kaisa, Pursula, Pekka·2019·2019 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS)

Abstract

This paper presents a system for measuring the bioimpedance of a wound, to give an indication of its healing progress without the need to remove the wound dressing. A 16-channel electrode array is printed on a composite nanocellulose-polyurethane substrate that is stretchable, breathable and biocompatible. An electronic readout system consists of an analogue multiplexor, analogue front end interrogated with an integrated impedance measurement device, and an on-board calibration circuit. The readout electronics is implemented on a polyimide flexible substrate, including additional sensing functions, wireless powering and radio communications easily integrated in various wound dressing scenarios. The electrode array is detachable from the readout allowing numerous application specific electrode patch configurations, and reuse of electronics with disposable, single-use electrode patches. The system is characterized measuring a range of known impedances, for measurements on a gelatine phantom and on a healthy human arm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/biocas.2019.8919095

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1088/1361-6579/aa63d6 · DOI
  2. 10.3390/s19112505 · DOI
  3. 10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S23 · DOI
  4. 10.1088/2058-8585/aae5d9 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/jps.21210 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.068 · DOI
  7. 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00047 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TTHZ.2011.2159551 · DOI
  9. 10.1155/2014/381251 · DOI
  10. 10.2741/1184 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1177/193229681200600126 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Mc Caffrey, C., Flak, J., Kiri, K., & Pursula, P.
Affiliations
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Venue
2019 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W2991827812
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Keywords
bioimpedance spectroscopy, wound healing monitoring, flexible electronics, stretchable sensors, on-chip calibration, wireless power transfer, radio communication, gelatine phantom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review