Cited by 16Network Security and Intrusion DetectionIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Generating IoT Edge Network Datasets based on the TON_IoT Telemetry Dataset

Zachos, Georgios, Essop, Ismael, Mantas, Georgios, Porfyrakis, Kyriakos, Ribeiro, Jose C., Rodriguez, Jonathan·2021·2021 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD)

Abstract

The rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Industrial IoT (IIoT), over the past few years, has been beneficial for the citizens, societies and industry. However, their resource-constrained and heterogenous nature renders them vulnerable to a wide range of threats. Therefore, novel security mechanisms, such as accurate and efficient anomaly-based intrusion detection systems (AIDSs), are required to be developed before IoT/IIoT networks reach their full potential in the market. However, there is a lack of up-to-date, representative and well-structured IoT/IIoT-specific datasets that are publicly available to the research community and constitute benchmark datasets for effective training and evaluation of Machine Learning models suitable for AIDSs in IoT/IIoT networks. Contribution to filling this research gap is of utmost importance and toward this direction the novel “TON_IoT Telemetry” dataset was recently published. Taking the opportunity to explore further this dataset, we targeted at its network-related part so as to generate IoT edge network specific datasets for effective development of more accurate and efficient IoT/IIoT-specific AIDSs. Therefore, in this paper, we present the methodology we followed to generate a set of IoT edge network specific datasets based on the “ToN_IoT Telemetry” dataset.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/camad52502.2021.9617799

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022862 · DOI
  2. moustafa, 0, ToN_IoT datasets, IEEE Dataport
  3. 0, VMware NSX
  4. 10.15439/2014F503 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 0, KALI Linux
  6. 0, Node-RED
  7. 0, HiveMQ
  8. 0, Vulnerable Public PHP Website
  9. 0, Microsoft Azure IoT Hub
  10. 0, Amazon Web Services AWS Lambda
  11. 10.1002/9781118867464.ch9 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/ett.4049 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1109/COMST.2018.2874978 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jnca.2017.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2969626 · DOI
  16. 10.3390/s21041528 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TII.2018.2852491 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/TII.2014.2300753 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/978-3-030-05195-2_14 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zachos, G., Essop, I., Mantas, G., Porfyrakis, K., Ribeiro, J. C., & Rodriguez, J.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Telecomunicações (PT)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
Venue
2021 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4200470600
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD) (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • ECSEL JU (H2020-ECSEL-2019-IA-876190)
  • European Union's H2020 Framework Programme (H2020/2014-2020)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (ECSEL/0006/2019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
dataset construction, anomaly-based intrusion detection, industrial IoT security, network telemetry, benchmark dataset, machine learning training data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review