Cited by 245IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AIWireless Body Area Networks

A Survey on Security Threats and Countermeasures in Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)

Papaioannou, Maria, Karageorgou, Marina, Mantas, Georgios, Sucasas, Victor, Essop, Ismael, Rodriguez, Jonathan, Lymberopoulos, Dimitrios·2022·Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies

Abstract

Internet of medical things (IoMT) is an emerging technology aiming to improve the patient's quality of life by enabling personalized e‐health services without limitations on time and location. Nevertheless, IoMT devices (eg, medical sensors) that constitute the key underlying elements of the IoMT edge network are vulnerable to various types of security threats and thus, they pose a significant risk to patient's privacy and safety. Based on that and the fact that the security is a critical factor for the successful integration of IoMT technology into pervasive healthcare systems, there is an urgent need for novel security mechanisms to preserve the security of the IoMT edge network. Toward this direction, the first step is the comprehensive understanding of existing and potential threats to the IoMT edge network environment. Thus, in this article, we provide a categorization of security threats to the edge network environment based on the major security objectives that they target. Moreover, we present a categorization of security countermeasures, derived from the literature, against threats to IoMT edge networks. The authors' intent is to provide a foundation for organizing research efforts toward the development of proper security countermeasures for protecting IoMT edge networks against internal and external threats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ett.4049

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attacks from an intruder can access information sent from the hardware system by directly attacking at the decryption point or by weakening the authentication procedure, such as eavesdropping, reply, MITM, rouge, DoS, and DDoS attacks, and these hamper the network layer of the IoMT.

    “Then, some attacks from the intruder can access the information sent from the hardware system by directly attacking at the decryption point or by weakening the authentication procedure such as Eavesdropping attack, reply attack, MITM attack, rouge attack, DoS attack, DDoS attack and these type of attack causes to hamper the network layer of the IoMT [200].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2][2] Anshuman Kalla Pawani Prombage Madhusanka Liyanage, ''Introduction to IoT.,'' in IoT Security: Advances in Authentication , 2020, pp. 1-25. -
  2. [32][32] NIST, 'Cissp Wordig Grossale,' Nist Ir , vol. 7298, no. Revision 2, p. 222, 2013. -
  3. [41][41] W. You and W. Learn, 'Fog Computing and the Internet of Things : Extend the Cloud to Where the Things Are,' pp. 1-6, 2020. -
  4. [47][47] A. Alrawais, A. Alhothaily, C. Hu, and X. Cheng, 'Fog Computing for the Internet of Things: Security and Privacy Issues,' IEEE Internet Comput. , vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 34-42, Mar. 2017. -
  5. [62][62] E. Edition, E. Edition, O. Systems, S. Edition, B. D. Communications, and S. Edition, Cryptography and Network Security , Eighth Edition . . -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papaioannou, M., Karageorgou, M., Mantas, G., Sucasas, V., Essop, I., Rodriguez, J., & Lymberopoulos, D.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Telecomunicações Aveiro Portugal
  • University of Patras (GR)
  • Instituto de Telecomunicações (PT)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
Venue
Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-23
Volume
33
Issue
6
ISSN
2161-3915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045149779
Cited by
245
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 3
FWCI
14.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
Internet of Medical Things, security countermeasures, biomedical sensors, patient privacy, pervasive healthcare, threat categorization, security objectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review