Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Content Detection in Large Language Models

Zou, Chenjun, Feng, Zhuoyan, Guan, Hongwei, Xing, Chuanjun·2024·2024 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data Application and Software Engineering (CBASE)

Abstract

This paper proposes and explores a content detection method for large language models based on the Chain of Thought (CoT) logic chain. By incrementally extracting logic chains from text or code and converting them into feature vectors, this method enables logical plagiarism detection and content verification for complex tasks. Particularly for classical algorithmic problems, such as dynamic programming, this approach effectively mitigates plagiarism attempts through variable renaming. The paper first delves into the theoretical foundation of CoT logic chains and analyzes their application mechanisms within large language models. It then provides a detailed account of the steps for feature extraction and similarity detection algorithms, including how to efficiently convert logic chains into feature vectors for comparison. To validate the effectiveness of this method, several classical algorithmic instances were selected for experimentation. Results indicate that the CoT logic chain-based content detection method offers significant advantages in detecting originality in academic papers and code. This approach not only substantially improves the detection rate of academic misconduct but also assists editors and reviewers in more accurately identifying AI-generated content, thereby holding broad applications in academic publishing, code review, and educational fields. Additionally, the paper discusses the potential application of this method in other domains, such as patent plagi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cbase64041.2024.10824407

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Luchen, 2023, Research on Content Detection Generated by Large Language Model and the Mechanism of Bypassing, Journal of Information Security Research, 9, 524
  2. Zhiwu, 2024, Detecting ChatGPT Generated Texts Based on Deep Pyramid Convolutional Neural Network, Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 8, 14
  3. Xibin, 2023, Research on the Detection of AI-Generated Academic Journal Texts, Science-Technology & Publication, 8, 56
  4. Chopra, 2020, Mastering Python Natural Language Processing
  5. Feng, 2023, Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical Perspective

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zou, C., Feng, Z., Guan, H., & Xing, C.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Institute of Technology,Harbin,China
Venue
2024 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data Application and Software Engineering (CBASE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-10-11
Pages
610-617
Cited by
2
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.