The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed Kalman Filter with Embedded Consensus Filters
Abstract
The problem of distributed Kalman filtering (DKF) for sensor networks is one of the most fundamental distributed estimation problems for scalable sensor fusion. This paper addresses the DKF problem by reducing it to two separate dynamic consensus problems in terms of weighted measurements and inverse-covariance matrices. These to data fusion problems are solved is a distributed way using low-pass and band-pass consensus filters. Consensus filters are distributed algorithms that allow calculation of average-consensus of time-varying signals. The stability properties of consensus filters is discussed in a companion CDC ’05 paper [24]. We show that a central Kalman filter for sensor networks can be decomposed into n micro-Kalman filters with inputs that are provided by two types of consensus filters. This network of micro-Kalman filters collectively are capable to provide an estimate of the state of the process (under observation) that is identical to the estimate obtained by a central Kalman filter given that all nodes agree on two central sums. Later, we demonstrate that our consensus filters can approximate these sums and that gives an approximate distributed Kalman filtering algorithm. A detailed account of the computational and communication architecture of the algorithm is provided. Simulation results are presented for a sensor network with 200 nodes and more than 1000 links.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Self-citationConsensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents
Saber, R. O., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003. · doi:10.1109/acc.2003.1239709 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522
Self-citationDistributed Kalman filtering for sensor networks
Olfati-Saber, R. (2007) · 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control · doi:10.1109/cdc.2007.4434303 · Cited by 1,586
Self-citationConsensus Filters for Sensor Networks and Distributed Sensor Fusion
Olfati-Saber, R., & Shamma, J. S. (2006) · Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control · doi:10.1109/cdc.2005.1583238 · Cited by 982
Self-citationSecure Control: Towards Survivable Cyber-Physical Systems
Cardenas, A. A., Amin, S., & Sastry, S. (2008) · 2008 The 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops · doi:10.1109/icdcs.workshops.2008.40 · Cited by 911
Kalman-Consensus Filter : Optimality, stability, and performance
Olfati-Saber, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference · doi:10.1109/cdc.2009.5399678 · Cited by 677
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Olfati-Saber, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-10-04
- Pages
- 8179-8184
- ISSN
- 0191-2216 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1528184823
- Cited by
- 1,024
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed Kalman Filter with Embedded Consensus Filters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cdc.2005.1583486
- The paper
- Olfati-Saber, R. (2006). Distributed Kalman Filter with Embedded Consensus Filters. Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc.2005.1583486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.