The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity analysis on imbalanced data sets by using ensemble models
Abstract
Many real-world applications have problems when learning from imbalanced data sets, such as medical diagnosis, fraud detection, and text classification. Very few minority class instances cannot provide sufficient information and result in performance degrading greatly. As a good way to improve the classification performance of weak learner, some ensemble-based algorithms have been proposed to solve class imbalance problem. However, it is still not clear that how diversity affects classification performance especially on minority classes, since diversity is one influential factor of ensemble. This paper explores the impact of diversity on each class and overall performance. As the other influential factor, accuracy is also discussed because of the trade-off between diversity and accuracy. Firstly, three popular re-sampling methods are combined into our ensemble model and evaluated for diversity analysis, which includes under-sampling, over-sampling, and SMOTE - a data generation algorithm. Secondly, we experiment not only on two-class tasks, but also those with multiple classes. Thirdly, we improve SMOTE in a novel way for solving multi-class data sets in ensemble model - SMOTEBagging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
The class imbalance problem: A systematic study1
Japkowicz, N., & Stephen, S. (2002) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-2002-6504 · Cited by 3,295
Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy
Kuncheva, L. I., & Whitaker, C. J. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022859003006 · Cited by 2,335
Cited by
Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications
Haixiang, G., Yijing, L., Shang, J., Mingyun, G., Yuanyue, H., & Bing, G. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.035 · Cited by 2,377
A Survey of Predictive Modeling on Imbalanced Domains
Branco, P., Torgo, L., & Ribeiro, R. P. (2017) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2907070 · Cited by 1,129
Clustering-based undersampling in class-imbalanced data
Lin, W.-C., Tsai, C.-F., Hu, Y.-H., & Jhang, J.-S. (2017) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.05.008 · Cited by 832
Wan, X., Zhang, X., & Liu, L. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11062606 · Cited by 90
Self-supervised Learning is More Robust to Dataset Imbalance
Liu, H., HaoChen, J. Z., Gaidon, A., & Ma, T. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.05025 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., & Yao, X.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-03
- Pages
- 324-331
- OpenAlex
- W2136256517
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity analysis on imbalanced data sets by using ensemble models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cidm.2009.4938667
- The paper
- Wang, S., & Yao, X. (2009). Diversity analysis on imbalanced data sets by using ensemble models. 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/cidm.2009.4938667
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.