An Improved VGG19 Transfer Learning Strip Steel Surface Defect Recognition Deep Neural Network Based on Few Samples and Imbalanced Datasets
Open accessAbstract
The surface defects’ region of strip steel is small, and has various defect types and, complex gray structures. There tend to be a large number of false defects and edge light interference, which lead traditional machine vision algorithms to be unable to detect defects for various types of strip steel. Image detection techniques based on deep learning require a large number of images to train a network. However, for a dataset with few samples with category imbalanced defects, common deep learning neural network training tasks cannot be carried out. Based on rapid image preprocessing algorithms (improved gray projection algorithm, ROI image augmentation algorithm) and transfer learning theory, this paper proposes a set of processes for complete strip steel defect detection. These methods achieved surface rapid screening, defect feature extraction, sample dataset’s category balance, data augmentation, defect detection, and classification. Through verification of the mixed dataset, composed of the NEU surface dataset and dataset in this paper, the recognition accuracy of the improved VGG19 network in this paper reached 97.8%. The improved VGG19 network performs slightly better than the baseline VGG19 in six types of defects, but the improved VGG19 performs significantly better in the surface seams defects. The convergence speed and accuracy of the improved VGG19 network were taken into account, and the detection rate was greatly improved with few samples and imbalanced datasets. This paper also has practical value in terms of extending its method of strip steel defect detection to other products.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper proposes an improved VGG19 transfer-learning pipeline with gray-scale projection screening and ROI random-crop augmentation for strip steel surface defect recognition on few-sample, imbalanced data. It reports 97.8% recognition accuracy on a mixed NEU plus surface-seams dataset and 54.6 FPS detection speed.
Key findings
- The improved VGG19 reached 97.8% accuracy on the mixed dataset; weighted-average precision/recall/F1 were 0.9786/0.9784/0.9784, versus baseline VGG19 at 0.9675/0.9676/0.9674.
- For surface seams, baseline VGG19 accuracy was 70% and improved VGG19 was 90%; improved VGG19 achieved precision 1.0000, recall 0.9000, and F1 0.9474 on 10 test images.
- The defect feature extraction algorithm ran at 3.5 ms per image (287.5 FPS) and was effective for large-area defects: cracks 83.8%, surface scratch 87.5%, surface seams 90.0%; it performed poorly on inclusions 0.83%, scab 2.5%, pitted surface 1.7%, and rolled in scale 1.3%.
- The network’s average detection time was 0.0183 s (54.6 FPS); on the NEU database it achieved 97.62% accuracy at 0.0192 s/52.1 FPS.
Methods
- The mixed dataset combined the NEU surface dataset—six defect classes with 300 images each, 1800 total, 200 × 200 pixels, 40.1 KB BMP grayscale images—and the authors’ surface-seams class with 50 grayscale images of about 30 KB. They randomly used 80% for training and 20% for testing, with the test set not augmented to balance classes.
- Preprocessing used an improved gray-scale projection algorithm for rapid surface screening and defect feature extraction, plus an ROI region random-crop augmentation algorithm to address category imbalance.
- The improved VGG19 used a VGG19 backbone with the first 15 layers frozen, replaced the remaining convolution and three fully connected layers with three convolution layers for 18 total layers, used hierarchical learning rates of 10^-6, 10^-4, and 10^-2 by a 2:2:6 rule, added maximum/average feature extraction modules, and used the RAdam optimizer with Python 3.6, Keras, and TensorFlow.
Limitations
- The paper states that new defect types similar to known defect forms can cause misjudgment and reduce recognition accuracy; the proposed response is to continue collecting new defect images, update the database, and retrain the model offline.
- The text makes evident that the feature extraction algorithm cannot effectively detect small-area defects such as inclusions, rolled in scale, or pitted surfaces, and degrades for high-brightness or high-reflective surfaces; the authors recommend dark-field lighting for those cases.
- The text also makes evident that the surface-seams test set contains only 10 images, so seam accuracy estimates are based on very few samples, and the network’s real-time performance is weaker than M-Pooling CNN and improved YOLO, though 54.6 FPS meets the stated basic online requirement of 10–60 FPS.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 22 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The improved VGG19 network performs significantly better than the baseline VGG19 in the surface seams defects.
“the improved VGG19 performs significantly better in the surface seams defects”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The detection rate of the improved VGG19 network was greatly improved with few samples and imbalanced datasets.
“The convergence speed and accuracy of the improved VGG19 network were taken into account, and the detection rate was greatly improved with few samples and imbalanced datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The recognition accuracy of the improved VGG19 network reached 97.8% on the mixed dataset composed of the NEU surface dataset and the dataset in this paper.
“Through verification of the mixed dataset, composed of the NEU surface dataset and dataset in this paper, the recognition accuracy of the improved VGG19 network in this paper reached 97.8%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The improved VGG19 network performs slightly better than the baseline VGG19 in six types of defects.
“The improved VGG19 network performs slightly better than the baseline VGG19 in six types of defects”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The improved gray-scale projection algorithm is especially effective for longitudinal cracks, transverse cracks, and large area surface defects.
“The algorithm is especially effective for longitudinal cracks, transverse cracks, and large area surface defects.”
- Also stated in: § 3.4. Strip Steel Surface Rapid Quality Screening and Defect Feature Extraction Experiment · plain
“our feature extraction algorithm is more effective for large area defects, such as longitudinal cracks, transverse cracks, surface seams, etc.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.4. Strip Steel Surface Rapid Quality Screening and Defect Feature Extraction Experiment · plain
- Findingnone given
The data augmentation algorithm based on ROI region random crop achieves sample balance in the categories.
“this paper proposes a data augmentation algorithm based on ROI region random crop for uneven categories, to achieve sample balance in the categories.”
- Also stated in: § 4.1. Category Imbalance Problem for Strip Steel Surface Defects · plain
“the paper proposed a data augmentation algorithm for uneven images' datasets, to achieve samples balance in the categories again.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § 4.1. Category Imbalance Problem for Strip Steel Surface Defects · plain
- Findingown data
The improved gray projection algorithm detected a longitudinal flaw image and its defect area perfectly.
“Similarly shown in Figure 7, our algorithm detected a longitudinal flaw image.It can be seen that our algorithm detected the defect area perfectly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The feature extraction algorithm cannot effectively detect small area defects such as inclusions, rolled in scale, or a pitted surface.
“However, the algorithm cannot effectively detect small area defects such as inclusions, rolled in scale, or a pitted surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
By observing images of strip steel surface, the surface defect area had a higher brightness or a darker brightness than the defect-free area.
“By observing images of strip steel surface, we found whether the surface defect area had a higher brightness or a darker brightness than the defect-free area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The dataset in this paper is a typical few samples and imbalanced dataset.
“It can be seen in Figure 9 that the dataset in this paper is a typical few samples and imbalanced dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The detection time of each image was 3.5 ms (287.5 FPS).
“The detection time of each image was 3.5 ms (287.5FPS).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The baseline VGG19 network has poor convergence performance on the testing dataset.
“The network has a poor convergence performance on the testing dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
False defects on the edge of strip steel have a common characteristic: the false defect edge is no longer a straight line, but a bent or broken fold line.
“Through a lot of experiments, it has been found that false defects on the edge of strip steel have a common characteristic: the false defect edge is no longer a straight line, but a bent or broken fold line.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The verified loss of the dataset was quite turbulent in the early stage of training.
“it was found that the verified loss of the dataset was quite turbulent in the early stage of training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
With the help of transfer learning, the network achieved strip steel defect-recognition successfully.
“With the help of transfer learning, our network achieved strip steel defect-recognition successfully.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep learning network requires a lot of high-quality annotated image data.
- Rests on an assumption: Strip steel defects emerge randomly on the industrial production line.
- Rests on an assumption: It takes a long time for strip steel production lines to collect enough defective samples, especially new strip steel production lines.
- Rests on an assumption: ImageNet dataset has a huge amount of data, and the VGG19 network model will not be overfitted on this dataset.
- Findingown data
The defect feature extraction algorithm proposed in Section 3.4 showed poor recognition of high brightness defects.
“In Section 3.4, the defect feature extraction algorithm proposed in this paper showed poor recognition of high brightness defects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For pitted surfaces, both baseline VGG19 and improved VGG19 misidentified one picture.
“For the defect of pitted surfaces, both the baseline VGG19 and the improved VGG19 model misidentified one piece of picture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The baseline VGG19 network achieved weighted average precision 0.9675, recall 0.9676, F1-score 0.9674 on 370 samples.
“| Weighted Avg | | 0.9675 | 0.9676 | 0.9674 | 370 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The final accuracy of the improved VGG19 model converged to 97.8%.
“After the test, the final accuracy of the model converged to 97.8%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Compared with M-pooling CNN and improved YOLO, our algorithm used the least amount of data.
“Compared with the M-pooling CNN algorithm and improved YOLO algorithm, our algorithm used the least amount of data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both baseline VGG19 and improved VGG19 models can fully identify categories of cracks, scabs, and rolled in scales.
“It can be seen that both the baseline VGG19 and the improved VGG19 model can fully identify categories of cracks, scabs, and rolled in scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The improved VGG19 network achieved weighted average precision 0.9786, recall 0.9784, F1-score 0.9784 on 370 samples.
“| Weighted Avg | | 0.9786 | 0.9784 | 0.9784 | 370 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When the data has a long-tail distribution, it can lead to bias in the classifier.
“When the data has a long-tail distribution, it can lead to bias in the classifier.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Yin, X., Yu, X., Sohn, K., Liu, X., and Chandraker, M. (2019, January 15–20). Feature Transfer Learning for Face Recognition with Under-Represented Data. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Cui, Y., Jia, M., Lin, T.Y., Song, Y., and Belongie, S. (2019, January 15–20). Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samples. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Various types of industrial image defects do not meet all the assumptions of semantic relevance and geometric correlation.
“However, various types of industrial image defects do not meet all the above assumptions [42,43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [42] Ghiasi, G., Lin, T.Y., and Le, Q.V. (2018, January 2–8). DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networks. Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Singh, K.K., and Lee, Y.J. (2017, January 22–29). Hide-and-Seek: Forcing a Network to be Meticulous for Weakly-supervised Object and Action Localization. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In general, the defect region ratio is 5% or less.
“In general, the defect region ratio is 5% or less (Steel Acceptance Criteria: GB.1965/1978).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Steel Acceptance Criteria: GB.1965/1978
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
RAdam has better performance than SGD when the network has a large learning rate and limited training dataset.
“RAdam has a better performance than SGD in the case of a network having a large learning rate and limited training dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Liu, L., Jiang, H., He, P., Chen, W., Liu, X., Gao, J., and Han, J. (2020, January 26–30). On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyond. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2020), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Overfitting is more obvious in deep learning neural networks.
“This phenomenon is more obvious in deep learning neural networks [45].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Sun, C., Shrivastava, A., Singh, S., and Gupta, A. (2017, January 22–29). Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The classifier is more inclined to identify classes with a sufficient sample size and rich diversity.
“The classifier is more inclined to identify classes with a sufficient sample size and rich diversity [4,5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Yin, X., Yu, X., Sohn, K., Liu, X., and Chandraker, M. (2019, January 15–20). Feature Transfer Learning for Face Recognition with Under-Represented Data. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Cui, Y., Jia, M., Lin, T.Y., Song, Y., and Belongie, S. (2019, January 15–20). Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samples. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Industrial images acquisition typically has few samples and imbalanced datasets with complex backgrounds, low-resolution pixels, and rare qualified images.
“For industrial images acquisition, because of the high speed of production lines and many disturbance factors, they are typically few samples and imbalanced datasets with complex backgrounds, low-resolution pixels, and rare qualified images.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The dataset in this paper is unable to support deep learning network training.
“The dataset unable to enough to support deep learning network training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Re-training an effective neural network convolution needs at least 1000 high-quality images of the same category.
- Interpretationreasoning
It is difficult to meet the requirements of strip steel defect detection only using the algorithm level approach method.
“It is difficult to meet the requirements of strip steel defect detection only using the algorithm level approach method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
An imbalanced sample problem will lead the training model to focus on large numbers of simple samples, while difficult samples with a smaller dataset will be ignored.
“An imbalanced sample problem will lead the training model to focus on large numbers of simple samples, while difficult samples with a smaller dataset will be ignored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
It is feasible to train few samples datasets on large baseline CNNs by fine-tuning networks' structures on ImageNet pre-training networks.
“Thanks to transfer learning and ImageNet's pre-training networks, it is feasible to train few samples datasets on large baseline CNNs by fine-tuning networks' structures on the pre-training networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Deep learning image detection techniques require a large number of images to train a network.
- Premisereasoning
A steel rolling production line speed of 10-30 m/s and a single camera view field of 50-100 cm require a detection speed of 10-60 FPS.
“Considering that the speed of a steel rolling production line is 10-30 m/s and the view field of a single camera is 50-100 cm, it requires a detection speed of detection system to be 10-60 FPS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The speed of a steel rolling production line is 10-30 m/s and the view field of a single camera is 50-100 cm.
- Interpretationown data
With the proposed processes, we can meet the basic requirements of online real-time detection.
“With these, we can meet the basic requirements of online real-time detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The speed of a steel rolling production line is 10-30 m/s and the view field of a single camera is 50-100 cm.
- May combine two claims. 44
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe improved gray-scale projection algorithm can filter out defect-free surfaces, edge false defects, and illumination interference, and extract defects on the surface effectively.
“The algorithm can filter out defect-free surfaces, edge false defects, and illumination interference, and extract defects on the surface effectively.”
- Also stated in: § 3.4. Strip Steel Surface Rapid Quality Screening and Defect Feature Extraction Experiment · plain
“It can be seen that our improved gray projection algorithm can quickly screen defect and defect-free surfaces, and extract defect features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.4. Strip Steel Surface Rapid Quality Screening and Defect Feature Extraction Experiment · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenFor defect images with high brightness background or high reflective surface, the algorithm will have some degradation in detection accuracy.
“For the defect images with high brightness background or high reflective surface, the algorithm will have some degradation in detection accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe mixed image dataset is a strip steel defect dataset with full annotation and class balance.
“This is a strip steel defect dataset with full annotation and class balance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe baseline VGG19 network's low learning rate resulted in slow convergence, falling to local optimal, large loss curve shocks on the testing dataset, and poor generalization.
“This resulted in slow convergence and falling to the local optimal value of the network, while the loss curve shocked greatly on the testing dataset, and achieved poor generalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A more complex model is more able to fit training data in traditional machine learning algorithms.
- Rests on an assumption: If the training dataset is too small, the model will become over-fitted.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn the medium term, there were occasional increases in loss.
“In the medium term, there as occasional increases in loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe mixed image dataset was pre-processed to create a new class balanced dataset.
“The mixed image dataset was pre-processed to create a new class balanced dataset”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe improved VGG19 network performs slightly better than baseline VGG19 in six types of defects, but significantly better in surface seams defects.
“The improved VGG19 network performs slightly better than the baseline VGG19 in these six types of defects, but the improved VGG19 performs significantly better in the surface seams defects.”
- Also stated in: § 7. Conclusions · plain
“The improved VGG19 network performs slightly better than the baseline VGG19 in six types of defects, but the improved VGG19 performs significantly better in the surface seams defects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 7. Conclusions · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe accuracy of baseline VGG19 and improved VGG19 on surface seams dataset are 70% and 90%, respectively.
“Therefore, the accuracy of the baseline VGG19 and the improved VGG19 model on surface seams dataset are 70% and 90%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTraditional detection algorithms can achieve high detection accuracy with fewer images, but their real-time performance is poor.
“As can be seen from Table 3, traditional detection algorithms can achieve high detection accuracy with fewer images, but their real-time performance is poor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur network's real-time performance was weaker than M-pooling CNN and improved YOLO, but its detection speed of 54.6 FPS meets the basic requirements of online real-time detection.
“Its real-time performance was weaker than those two algorithms, but the detection speed of our network was 54.6 FPS, which means it meets the basic requirements of online real-time detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The speed of a steel rolling production line is 10-30 m/s and the view field of a single camera is 50-100 cm.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe improved VGG19 network's convergence and accuracy were greatly improved compared to the basic network.
“Figure 15 shows that the convergence and accuracy of the network was greatly improved on the basic network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur network's average detection time for a single image was 0.0183 s, and it can detect about 54 images per second.
“Our network's average detection time for a single image was 0.0183 s, and it can detect about 54 images per second.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur algorithm achieved 97.75% accuracy, 0.0183 s average detection per image (54.6 FPS), on 1850 samples.
“| Ours | DNN Classification | 97.75% | 0.0183 s 54.6 FPS | 1850 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe surface seams dataset has only 40 pictures and only 10 pictures for the testing dataset.
“However, the surface seams dataset has only 40 pieces of pictures and only 10 pieces of pictures for the testing dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe improved VGG19 model occasionally had a sudden increase in loss during training, but the verification loss decreased and tended to converge as training progressed.
“The model occasionally had a sudden increase in loss during the training period, but the verification function's loss decreased and tended to converge as the training progressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor surface scratch, baseline VGG19 misidentified four pictures and improved VGG19 misidentified three pictures.
“For the defect categories of surface scratch, the baseline VGG19 misidentified four pieces of pictures and the improved VGG19 model misidentified three pieces of pictures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur algorithm achieved 97.62% accuracy and 0.0192 s/52.1 FPS on the NEU database.
“| Ours | 97.62% | 0.0192 s/52.1 FPS |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor inclusions, baseline VGG19 misidentified four pictures and improved VGG19 misidentified three pictures.
“For the defect categories of inclusions, the baseline VGG19 misidentified four pieces of pictures and the improved VGG19 model misidentified three pieces of pictures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFor deep learning detection algorithms, detection accuracy increases with data volume and real-time performance is better than traditional algorithms.
“For deep learning detection algorithms (such as M-Pooling CNN [17], Improved YOLO [19]), their detection accuracy increases with data volume and their real-time performance is better than that of the traditional algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Masci, J., Meier, U., Ciresan, D., Schmidhuber, J., and Fricout, G. (2012, January 10–15). Steel defect classification with Max-Pooling Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Brisbane, QLD, Australia. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Li, 2018, Real-time Detection of Steel Strip Surface Defects Based on Improved YOLO Detection Network, IFAC-Pap.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor products surface defect detection carried on a conveyor belt, the human eye can detect only 60% of the surface defects, and the width of the product cannot exceed 2 m and the moving speed of the products cannot exceed 30 m/s, in the best case.
“For products surface defect detection carried on a conveyor belt, the human eye can detect only 60% of the surface defects, and the width of the product cannot exceed 2 m and, the moving speed of the products cannot exceed 30 m/s, in the best case [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Srinivasan, 1992, FDAS: A Knowledge-based Framework for Analysis of Defects in Woven Textile Structures, J. Text. Inst. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed ROI region random crop algorithm can extract details of sample characteristics and enlarge edge and fine trivial details in the ROI region.
“The industrial image data augmentation algorithm based on ROI region random crop in this paper can extract details of samples' characteristics and enlarge images' edge and other fine trivial details in the ROI region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis kind of model generalization on the testing dataset is poor, and it can lead the model to prefer a dataset with more samples or samples with a low identification degree.
“This kind of model generalization on the testing dataset is poor, it can lead the model to prefer a dataset with more samples or samples with a low identification degree [41].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Springer Nature Editorial (2016). More accountability for big-data algorithms. Nature, 537, 449. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOn the NEU database, ResNet50 with the MFN module achieves a 99.7% detection rate with a speed of 6.1 FPS.
“On the NEU database, ResNet50 with the MFN module achieves a 99.7% detection rate with a speed of 6.1 FPS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] He, 2020, An End-to-End Steel Surface Defect Detection Approach via Fusing Multiple Hierarchical Features, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe category imbalance problem is mainly reflected in two aspects: positive and negative samples imbalance, with the positive and negative samples ratio reaching 1:100, and uneven difficulty samples.
“The category imbalance problem is mainly reflected in two aspects: positive and negative samples imbalance (the positive and negative samples ratio reached 1:100) and uneven difficulty samples (simple samples leading to loss function).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningA CCD camera captures the edge region and background image simultaneously during image acquisition, which introduces false edge defects.
“Therefore, in order to ensure full coverage of the strip steel surface, a CCD camera captures the edge region and background image simultaneously during the image acquisition process.However, it will introduce false edge defects”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCompared with VGG19, VGG11, VGG13 and VGG16 are shallow networks.
“Compared with VGG19 and, VGG11, VGG13 and VGG16 are shallow networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningDue to the large number of parameters in the full connection layer, three full connection layers will greatly slow down the efficiency of network training and recognition.
“However, due to the large number of parameters in the full connection layer, three full connection layers will greatly slow down the efficiency of network training and recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGAN-based image data augmentation algorithms are mainly used for relatively few samples datasets with high-resolution, but they are not applied to few samples datasets images with low-resolution on an industrial scale.
“These kinds of algorithms are mainly used for relatively few samples datasets with high-resolution, but they are not applied to few samples datasets images with low-resolution on an industrial scale [44].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Zhao, Z., Li, B., and Dong, R. (2018, January 28–31). A Surface Defect Detection Method Based on Positive Samples. Proceedings of the 5th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI), Nanjing, China. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA crack detection method based on a deep fully convolutional network with VGG16 backbones achieved about 90% average precision on a subset of 500 annotated 227 × 227-pixel crack-labeled images.
“The network achieved about 90% average precision on a subset of 500 annotated 227 × 227-pixel crack-labeled images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Dung, 2018, Autonomous concrete crack detection using deep fully convolutional neural network, Autom. Constr. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe cost matrix of algorithm level approach methods needs to be provided by experts in the field based on prior knowledge of the task, which in many real-world problems is not achievable.
“The cost matrix of these algorithm needs to be provided by experts in the field based on prior knowledge of the task, which in many real-world problems is not achievable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough high-level information of different images is different, underlying features are similar, which is the basis of image data transfer learning.
“Although high-level information of different images is different, underlying features are similar [20].This is the basis of image data transfer learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Geirhos, R., Rubisch, P., Michaelis, C., Bethge, M., Wichmann, F.A., and Brendel, W. (2019, January 6–9). ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2019), New Orleans, LA, USA.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe proposed ROI region random crop algorithm is a data-level approach that eases the uneven difficulty samples problem to a certain extent and allows difficult samples to be identified by local details.
“This is a data level approach method to ease the uneven difficulty samples problem to a certain extent, and allow difficult samples to be identified by local details.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRapid screening of defect-free surfaces can greatly decrease the amount of calculation required and improve detection efficiency.
“Therefore, rapid screening of defect-free surfaces can not only greatly decrease the amount of calculation required, but also improved detection efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn the distribution of strip steel defects, the edge portion is a defect-prone region of the strip steel surface.
“In the distribution of strip steel defects, the edge portion is a defect-prone region of the strip steel surface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningData level approach methods rely on a well-defined distance measure, but industrial datasets often contain multiple non-linear features or missing values.
“These methods rely on a well-defined distance measure, but industrial datasets often contain multiple non-linear features or missing values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed ROI region random cropping data augmentation algorithm can generate high-quality industrial images from original image datasets on the actual images demanded.
“This algorithm can generate high-quality industrial images from original image datasets on the actual images demanded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed ROI region random cropping data augmentation algorithm can solve the category imbalance problem using a data-level approach and can be combined with traditional image data augmentation techniques to ease few-sample dataset problems to a certain extent.
“It can not only solve the category imbalance problem using the data level approach method but also can be combined with traditional image data augmentation techniques to ease the problems of few samples datasets to a certain extent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRAdam has the advantages of both Adam and SGD, ensuring fast convergence and avoiding local optimal, as its convergence result is insensitive to the network's initial value learning rate.
“RAdam has the advantages of both Adam and SGD, which can not only ensure fast convergence speed but also avoid dropping into the local optimal, as the convergence result is insensitive to the network's initial value learning rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Liu, L., Jiang, H., He, P., Chen, W., Liu, X., Gao, J., and Han, J. (2020, January 26–30). On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyond. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2020), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTransfer learning can be successfully applied using image data from an entirely different domain.
“Author [21] showed that transfer learning can be successfully applied using image data from an entirely different domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Kim, S., Kim, W., Noh, Y.K., and Park, F.C. (2017, January 14–19). Transfer learning for automated optical inspection. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Anchorage, AK, USA. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe improved gray projection algorithm can save time on manual image labeling and provide high-quality defect data for the subsequent ROI image augmentation algorithm.
“The algorithm can save time on manual image labeling, and provide high-quality defect data for the subsequent ROI image augmentation algorithm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenFor few samples datasets with low-quality images, it is not enough to support the training of the GAN network.
“However, for few samples datasets (each type of image only has a dozen images or less, each image is a grayscale image of about 30~50 KB) with low-quality images, it is not enough to support the training of the GAN network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe unstable loss curve of the baseline VGG19 indicates unreasonable network design and network structure, needing further improvement.
“the unstable loss curve obviously has some unreasonable network design and network structure, needing further improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A more complex model is more able to fit training data in traditional machine learning algorithms.
- Rests on an assumption: If the training dataset is too small, the model will become over-fitted.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe background subtraction method in actual production suffers from the light environment, camera hardware performance and image blurring, and a large number of false defect images are detected with this method.
“However, the background subtraction method in actual production suffers from the light environment, camera hardware performance and image blurring; a large number of false defect images are detected with this method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe data level approach method and algorithm level approach method must be combined to deal with difficult samples and abnormal samples using defect detection and classification processes.
“The data level approach method and algorithm level approach method must be combined to deal with difficult samples and abnormal samples using defect detection and classification processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningEnsemble learning does not always lead to a better performance.
“However, ensemble learning does not always lead to a better performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTo define a reasonable distance measure on these datasets is very difficult, and requires tremendous extra computing resources to meet real-time requirements.
“To define a reasonable distance measure on these datasets is very difficult, and requires tremendous extra computing resources to meet real-time requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe improved VGG19 model's generalization and robustness were greatly improved.
“the generalization and robustness had been greatly improved”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCracks, scabs, and rolled in scales defects have obvious features and are easy for the model to recognize.
“These three types of defects have obvious features and are easy for the model to recognize.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhen there is a similarity between a new defect form and a known defect form, the model will make a misjudgment, which will greatly reduce the accuracy of defect recognition.
“When there is a similarity between a new defect form and a known defect form, the model will make a misjudgment, which will greatly reduce the accuracy of defect recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: With continued production line developments, various kinds of new defect types will be created.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA model with a certain complexity can achieve high accuracy and recognition speed and prevent non-convergence and over-fitting.
“It is clear that a model with a certain complexity can not only achieve high accuracy and recognition speed, but also prevent the problem of non-convergence and over-fitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed method is a non-contact and nondestructive machine vision detection method with high detection rate, strong real-time performance, and perfect anti-interference.
“It is a non-contact and nondestructive machine vision detection method that has the advantages of a high detection rate, strong real-time performance, and perfect anti-interference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe model in Author's work [48] achieved an accuracy of 98.1% and a recognition speed of 476.2 FPS (2.1 ms), using a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti.
“Although the model in Author's work [48] achieved an accuracy of 98.1% and a recognition speed of 476.2 FPS (2.1 ms), a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti was used to train and test the neural network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Kostenetskiy, 2019, Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection, FME Trans. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe model in Author's work [48] is simple in structure and easy to build, but its original data were pre-processed by the normalization Z-Score function.
“Although the model is simple in structure and easy to build, the original data were pre-processed by the normalization Z-Score function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Kostenetskiy, 2019, Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection, FME Trans. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe experimental results show that the improved VGG19 network has high practicability and reliability and has practical value for strip steel defects detection.
“The experimental results show that the improved VGG19 network proposed in this paper has high practicability and reliability; it has a certain practical value for strip steel defects detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe model in Author's work [48] is not an end-to-end model, and the time to pre-process the original data was much greater than the time for the network to recognize defects.
“It is not an end-to-end model, and the time to pre-process the original data was much greater than the time for the network to recognize defects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Kostenetskiy, 2019, Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection, FME Trans. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA very deep network is not really required for online real-time defect classification; detection accuracy, speed and complexity need to be balanced.
“As can be seen from Table 4, a very deep network is not really required for the online real-time defect classification task; the detection accuracy, speed and complexity of the network need to be balanced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe proposed improved VGG19 transfer learning network has strong generalization and good convergence.
“In summary, this paper proposed An Improved VGG19 Transfer Learning Strip Steel Surface Defect Recognition Deep Neural Network Based on Few Samples and Imbalanced Datasets, which has a strong generalization and good convergence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep learning image detection techniques require a large number of images to train a network.
“Image detection techniques based on deep learning require a large number of images to train a network.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For a dataset with few samples with category imbalanced defects, common deep learning neural network training tasks cannot be carried out.
“However, for a dataset with few samples with category imbalanced defects, common deep learning neural network training tasks cannot be carried out.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional machine learning algorithms do not have enough data, either in terms of quantity or quality, to train a model.
“Traditional machine learning algorithms do not have enough data, either in terms of quantity or quality, to train a model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Due to the small amount of training data of the network in this paper, the recognition accuracy of the network is relatively low on the shallow network, and the convergence of the network is poor.
“Due to the small amount of training data of the network in this paper, the recognition accuracy of the network is relatively low on the shallow network, and the convergence of the network is poor.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A more complex model is more able to fit training data in traditional machine learning algorithms.
“In traditional machine learning algorithms, a more complex model is more able to fit training data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
If the training dataset is too small, the model will become over-fitted.
“if the training dataset is too small, the model will become over-fitted.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Re-training an effective neural network convolution needs at least 1000 high-quality images of the same category.
“According to image recognition contest experience of ImageNet, re-training an effective neural network convolution needs at least 1000 high-quality images of the same category.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The deep learning network requires a lot of high-quality annotated image data.
“The deep learning network requires a lot of high-quality annotated image data”
The paper relies on this without support.
Strip steel defects emerge randomly on the industrial production line.
“strip steel defects emerge randomly on the industrial production line.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It takes a long time for strip steel production lines to collect enough defective samples, especially new strip steel production lines.
“It takes a long time for strip steel production lines to collect enough defective samples, especially new strip steel production lines.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ImageNet dataset has a huge amount of data, and the VGG19 network model will not be overfitted on this dataset.
“However, ImageNet dataset has a huge amount of data, and the VGG19 network model will not be overfitted on this dataset.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ImageNet dataset is mainly the data of life scenes and has a big gap with the strip defect dataset in this paper.
“ImageNet dataset is mainly the data of life scenes (such as cats, bicycles, people), which has a big gap with the strip defect dataset in this paper.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The speed of a steel rolling production line is 10-30 m/s and the view field of a single camera is 50-100 cm.
“Considering that the speed of a steel rolling production line is 10-30 m/s and the view field of a single camera is 50-100 cm”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the actual production line, the actual time is slightly larger than the theoretical detection time due to data transfer between different task modules.
“In the actual production line, the actual time is slightly larger than this value due to data transfer between different task modules.”
The paper relies on this without support.
With continued production line developments, various kinds of new defect types will be created.
“With continued production line developments, various kinds of new defect types will be created.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human eye observation range and speed are limited, generally requiring product width not to exceed 2 m and product movement speed not to exceed 30 m/s, otherwise effective observation is not possible.
“In addition, the human eye observation range and speed are limited, generally requiring that the product width cannot exceed 2 m and the product movement speed cannot exceed 30 m/s, otherwise the human eye will not be able to make effective observations [35]”
From Steel Surface Defect Recognition: A Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The stated 18-layer backbone is later assigned a 19th layer
MinorThe paper says the improved VGG19 backbone has 18 layers, then describes connecting its 17th, 18th and 19th layers to feature-extraction modules. An 18-layer backbone has no 19th layer.
“Therefore, the improved VGG19 backbone neural network had 18 layers in total; the network layers set their learning rates as 10 -6 , 10 -4 and 10 -2 for different layer areas by the rule of 2:2:6.”
“In order to allow the improved VGG19 backbone neural network to extract multi-level feature information, the 17th, 18th and 19th layers were connected with a maximum and average feature extraction module and a convolution layer, respectively.”
A column outside the threshold is classified both as defect-free and as defective
MinorRule (1) says a column whose maximum-minimum gray-scale difference is outside the threshold is defect-free. Rule (6) says a column with that same out-of-range difference is highlighted defective when its average is high.
“(1) If the difference [C Max -C Min ] between the maximum gray-scale value and minimum gray-scale value on the vertical projection is not within (1 ± µ) Global Avg , the column of the image is defect-free.”
“(6) If the [C Max -C Min ] is not within (1 ± µ) Global Avg , but C Avg is 1.5 times to 2 times as much as Global Avg , the column of the image is a highlighted defective.”
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 74,248 · see citing works
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollar, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.324 · Cited by 30,581 · see citing works
A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions
Ojala, T., Pietikäinen, M., & Harwood, D. (1996) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(95)00067-4 · Cited by 6,882 · see citing works
ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning
He, H., Bai, Y., Garcia, E. A., & Shutao Li, A. (2008) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2008.4633969 · Cited by 4,945 · see citing works
A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data
Batista, G. E. A. P. A., Prati, R., & Monard, M. (2004) · SKDD · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007735 · Cited by 4,271 · see citing works
Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samples
Cui, Y., Jia, M., Lin, T.-Y., Song, Y., & Belongie, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00949 · Cited by 3,094 · see citing works
Training Region-Based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Mining
Shrivastava, A., Gupta, A., & Girshick, R. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.89 · Cited by 2,686 · see citing works
Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era
Sun, C., Shrivastava, A., Singh, S., & Gupta, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.97 · Cited by 2,484 · see citing works
Exploratory Undersampling for Class-Imbalance Learning
Liu, X., Wu, J., & Zhou, Z. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2007853 · Cited by 2,477 · see citing works
The foundations of cost-sensitive learning
Elkan, C. (2001) · Cited by 1,812 · see citing works
On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and BeyondPreprint
Liu, L., Jiang, H., He, P., Chen, W., Liu, X., Gao, J., & Han, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.03265 · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
Self-citationGeirhos, R., Rubisch, P., Michaelis, C., Bethge, M., Wichmann, F. A., & Brendel, W. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.12231 · Cited by 1,490 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although high‐level information of different images is different, underlying features are similar [20].”
BackgroundAn End-to-End Steel Surface Defect Detection Approach via Fusing Multiple Hierarchical Features
He, Y., Song, K., Meng, Q., & Yan, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2019.2915404 · Cited by 1,341 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Author [22] proposed a baseline ResNet convolution neural network (CNN) with a multilevel feature fusion network (MFN) module.”
BackgroundAutonomous concrete crack detection using deep fully convolutional neural network
Dung, C. V., & Anh, L. D. (2019) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.028 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
KNN approach to unbalanced data distributions: a case study involving information extraction
Ziang, J. (2003) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Singh, K. K., & Lee, Y. J. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.381 · Cited by 724 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, various types of industrial image defects do not meet all the above assumptions [42,43].”
BackgroundA-Fast-RCNN: Hard Positive Generation via Adversary for Object Detection
Wang, X., Shrivastava, A., & Gupta, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.324 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Han, T., Liu, C. C., Yang, W., & Jiang, D. (2019) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2019.08.012 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Gradient Harmonized Single-Stage Detector
Li, B., Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33018577 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Diversity analysis on imbalanced data sets by using ensemble models
Wang, S., & Yao, X. (2009) · IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) · doi:10.1109/cidm.2009.4938667 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networksPreprint
Ghiasi, G., Lin, T.-Y., & Le, Q. V. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.12890 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Real-time detection of steel strip surface defects based on improved yolo detection network
Li, J., Su, Z., Geng, J., & Yin, Y. (2018) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.412 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Wind power prediction using deep neural network based meta regression and transfer learning
Qureshi, A. S., Khan, A., Zameer, A., & Usman, A. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.031 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Feature Transfer Learning for Face Recognition With Under-Represented Data
Yin, X., Yu, X., Sohn, K., Liu, X., & Chandraker, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00585 · Cited by 346 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The classi‐ fier is more inclined to identify classes with a sufficient sample size and rich diversity [4,5].”
BackgroundSteel defect classification with Max-Pooling Convolutional Neural Networks
Masci, J., Meier, U., Ciresan, D., Schmidhuber, J., & Fricout, G. (2012) · The 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2012.6252468 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
The Influence of Class Imbalance on Cost-Sensitive Learning: An Empirical Study
Liu, X.-Y., & Zhou, Z. (2006) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2006.158 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Surface defect classification of steels with a new semi-supervised learning method
Di, H., Ke, X., Peng, Z., & Dongdong, Z. (2019) · Optics and Lasers in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.01.011 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
A semi-supervised convolutional neural network-based method for steel surface defect recognition
Gao, Y., Gao, L., Li, X., & Yan, X. (2019) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101825 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Research Progress of Automated Visual Surface Defect Detection for Industrial Metal Planar Materials
Fang, X., Luo, Q., Zhou, B., Li, C., & Tian, L. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20185136 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
A Surface Defect Detection Method Based on Positive Samples
Zhao, Z., Li, B., Dong, R., & Zhao, P. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97310-4_54 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
FDAS: A Knowledge-based Framework for Analysis of Defects in Woven Textile Structures
Srinivasan, K., Dastoor, P. H., Radhakrishnaiah, P., & Jayaraman, S. (1992) · Journal of the Textile Institute · doi:10.1080/00405009208631217 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Filter-based feature selection for rail defect detection
Mandriota, C., Nitti, M., Ancona, N., Stella, E., & Distante, A. (2004) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-004-0148-3 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Transfer learning for automated optical inspection
Kim, S., Kim, W., Noh, Y.-K., & Park, F. C. (2017) · 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2017.7966162 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Improved Sobel algorithm for defect detection of rail surfaces with enhanced efficiency and accuracy
Shi, T., Kong, J.-Y., Wang, X.-D., Liu, Z., & Zheng, G. (2016) · Journal of Central South University · doi:10.1007/s11771-016-3350-3 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Hu, H., Liu, Y., Liu, M., & Nie, L. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.05.134 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Steel Surface Defect Detection Using Texture Segmentation Based on Multifractal Dimension
Yazdchi, M., Yazdi, M., & Mahyari, A. G. (2009) · 2009 International Conference on Digital Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icdip.2009.68 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Fast defect detection for various types of surfaces using random forest with VOV features
Kwon, B.-K., Won, J., & Kang, D. (2015) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s12541-015-0125-y · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Tian, S., & Xu, K. (2017) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met7080311 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
More accountability for big-data algorithms
(2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/537449a · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A surface defects inspection method based on multidirectional gray-level fluctuation
Ma, Y., Li, Q., Zhou, Y., He, F., & Xi, S. (2017) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.1177/1729881417703114 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection
Kostenetskiy, P., Alkapov, R., Vetoshkin, N., Chulkevich, R., Napolskikh, I., & Poponin, O. (2019) · FME Transactions · doi:10.5937/fmet1904765k · Cited by 23 · see citing works
(2009) · 2009 ICCAS-SICE · Cited by 15 · see citing works
S-OHEM: Stratified Online Hard Example Mining for Object Detection
Li, M., Zhang, Z., Yu, H., Chen, X., & Li, D. (2017) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7305-2_15 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
DNN Transfer Learning Based Non-Linear Feature Extraction for Acoustic Event Classification
Mun, S., Shin, M., Shon, S., Kim, W., Han, D. K., & Ko, H. (2017) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2017edl8048 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Chu, M., Zhao, J., Gong, R., & Liu, L. (2017) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc.2017.7979072 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Wu, 2000, Nondestructive testing technique for strip surface defects and its applications, Nondestruct. Test., 22, 312
- Tang, 2011, Steel Surface Defect Recognition Based on Support Vector Machine and Image Processing, China Mech. Eng., 22, 1402
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Steel Surface Defect Recognition: A Survey
Wen, X., Shan, J., He, Y., & Song, K. (2022) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings13010017 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Karacı, A. (2022) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-06918-x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
A Transfer Residual Neural Network Based on ResNet-50 for Detection of Steel Surface Defects
Zhang, L., Bian, Y., Jiang, P., & Zhang, F. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13095260 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Bi, C., Hu, N., Zou, Y., Zhang, S., Xu, S., & Yu, H. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12081843 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
FDD: a deep learning–based steel defect detectors
Akhyar, F., Liu, Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Shih, T. K., & Lin, C. (2023) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-023-11087-9 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Wen, L., Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3168432 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
A Review of Metal Surface Defect Detection Technologies in Industrial Applications
Qiao, Q., Hu, H., Ahmad, A. A., & Wang, K. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3544578 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Chun, S.-W., Song, D.-J., Lee, K., Kim, M.-J., Kim, M. S., Kim, K.-S., & Mo, C. (2024) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.112918 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Das, H. S., Das, A., Neog, A., Mallik, S., Bora, K., & Zhao, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.1097207 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Chhabra, M., Sharan, B., Barachi, M. E., & Kumar, M. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-18939-w · Cited by 47 · see citing works
A Survey of Vision-Based Methods for Surface Defects’ Detection and Classification in Steel Products
Ibrahim, A. A. M. S., & Tapamo, J. (2024) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics11020025 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Hao, Z., Li, Z., Ren, F., Lv, S., & Ni, H. (2022) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met12020311 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Bouguettaya, A., Mentouri, Z., & Zarzour, H. (2023) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-023-10947-8 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Bouguettaya, A., & Zarzour, H. (2024) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-024-13341-0 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A Weld Surface Defect Recognition Method Based on Improved MobileNetV2 Algorithm
Ding, K., Niu, Z., Hui, J., Zhou, X., & Chan, F. T. S. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10193678 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Ibrahim, A. A. M. S., & Tapamo, J. (2024) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02066 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Huang, Q., Zhang, F., Zhao, Y., & Duan, J. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110121 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wu, J., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23229140 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationZero-DD: Zero-sample defect detection for industrial products
Zhang, H., Pan, R., Chang, F., He, L., Dong, Z., & Yang, J. (2022) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108516 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection
Zabin, M., Kabir, A. N. B., Kabir, M. K., Choi, H., & Uddin, J. (2023) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z · Cited by 24 · see citing works
He, Y., Fan, B., Sun, L., Fan, X., Zhang, J., Li, Y., & Suo, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1190591 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Steel Strip Defect Sample Generation Method Based on Fusible Feature GAN Model under Few Samples
Yi, C., Chen, Q., Xu, B., & Huang, T. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23063216 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Hussain, T., Hong, J., & Seok, J. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.050884 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Impact of Image Compression on the Performance of Steel Surface Defect Classification with a CNN
Benbarrad, T., Eloutouate, L., Arioua, M., Elouaai, F., & Laanaoui, M. D. (2021) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan10040073 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Liu, J., Song, S., Wang, J., Balaiti, M., Song, N., & Li, S. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22020656 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Recognition of Edible Fungi Fruit Body Diseases Based on Improved ShuffleNetV2
Xu, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, H., Yang, D., Zhou, L., & Yu, H. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13061530 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A study of engine room smoke detection based on proactive machine vision model for intelligent ship
Zhang, P., Song, Z., Li, C., Liu, Y., Zou, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, P. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122689 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Steel surface defect recognition using classifier combination
Zaghdoudi, R., Bouguettaya, A., & Boudiaf, A. (2024) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-024-13407-z · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Wavelet Texture Descriptor for Steel Surface Defect Classification
Belila, D., Khaldi, B., & Aiadi, O. (2024) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma17235873 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Lin, L., Wang, Y., Zhao, S., Liu, J., Zhang, S., & Zhang, G. (2022) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jei.31.6.063056 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Wang, J., Li, Z., Chen, Q., Ding, K., Zhu, T., & Ni, C. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10162017 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Wang, J., Zhang, Q., & Liu, G. (2022) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ac6fb2 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Akhyar, F., Furqon, E. N., & Lin, C. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22114257 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Chen, R., Hu, P., Gui, X., & Hua, L. (2024) · Nondestructive Testing And Evaluation · doi:10.1080/10589759.2024.2319261 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Xu, M., Wei, J., & Feng, X. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109469 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
An Improved YOLOv8 Model for Strip Steel Surface Defect Detection
Wang, J., Chen, T., Xu, X., Zhao, L., Yuan, D., Du, Y., Guo, X., & Chen, N. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15010052 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Defects Recognition of Train Wheelset Tread Based on Improved Spiking Neural Network
Zhang, C., Huang, C., & He, J. (2023) · Chinese Journal of Electronics · doi:10.23919/cje.2022.00.162 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Boudiaf, A., Benlahmidi, S., Dahane, A., & Bouguettaya, A. (2024) · Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention · doi:10.1007/s11668-024-01927-5 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Mohammadi, S., Karganroudi, S. S., Adda, M., & Ibrahim, H. (2025) · Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation · doi:10.1016/j.geits.2025.100332 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Li, R., Hou, K., Zhu, M., Dai, Q., Ni, J., Liu, X., & Li, X. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3481031 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Hao, L., Shen, P., Pan, Z., & Xu, Y. D. (2023) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1208781 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Metal surface defect detection based on Latitude-Longitude light sources
Li, S., Yan, Z., Li, P., Duan, R., & Xin, T. (2024) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114315 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Tang, W.-P., Liong, S., Chen, C., Tsai, M., Hsieh, P.-C., Tsai, Y., Chen, S.-H., & Wang, K.-C. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11209473 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Defect Detection and Classification of Strip Steel Based on Improved VIT Model
Xing, L., Li, T., Fan, H., & Zhu, H. (2022) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-03948-5_26 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Deep Learning Applications in the Analysis of Wear Mechanisms in Metallic Materials: A Review
Wang, X., Xiao, B., Zhang, B., Sun, R., Li, C., & Liaw, P. K. (2025) · ACS Materials Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c00688 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
High-resolution image-based surface defect detection method for hot-rolled strip steel
Feng, X., Gao, X., & Luo, L. (2022) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jei.31.3.033020 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A Novel Approach for Jute Pest Detection Using Improved VGG-19 and XAI
Bragadeeshwaran, C., Sairam, R., Aishwarya, A., & Moorthy, R. S. (2024) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt61001.2024.10723939 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Optimal surface defect detector design based on deep learning for 3D geometry
Suh, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88112-2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A Method for Steel Surface Defect Recognition Based on Deep Learning and Receptive Field Block
Gan, J., & Huang, C. (2021) · International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI) · doi:10.1109/icsai53574.2021.9664135 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Explainable Machine Vision Techniques for Fish Disease Detection with Deep Transfer Learning
Isaac, S., Daniel, O., Grivin, M., Kyagaba, J. M., Lule, E., & Marvin, G. (2024) · International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC) · doi:10.1109/icesc60852.2024.10689742 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ye, L., Zhao, X., He, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Q., & Shi, A. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14091699 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Surface Defect Detection with Limited Training Data: A Case Study on Crown Wheel Surface Inspection
Zhu, X., Björkman, M., Maki, A., Hanson, L. Å., & Mårtensson, P. (2023) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2023.09.172 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Zhao, S., Zhao, G., Wang, L., Liu, B., Na, Z., Liu, Z., Yu, Z., & He, W. (2024) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2024.1447116 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hussain, T., & Seok, J. (2024) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2024.056621 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Surface Defect Detection of Aluminum Material Based on HRNet Feature Extraction
Jia, B., Luo, X., Tao, R., & Shi, Y. (2021) · International Conference on Data Science and Information Technology (DSIT) · doi:10.1145/3478905.3478914 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mentouri, Z., Bouguettaya, A., Doghmane, H., Gherfi, K., & Bendjoudi, S. (2024) · International Conference on Embedded Systems and Artificial Intelligence (ESAI) · doi:10.1109/esai62891.2024.10913550 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Zhao, J. X., Liu, B., Wu, R., Han, L., & Chen, M. (2024) · Signal Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1007/s11760-023-02931-2 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A review of deep learning-based surface defect detection techniques for strip steel
Shang, F., Chen, H., Sun, B., Miao, R., Zhou, X., Xing, C., & Zhang, P. (2026) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2026.121905 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A zero-shot learning for property prediction of wear-resistant steel based on Multiple-source
Liu, Y., Wei, S., Jiang, T., & Yu, H. (2023) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ad04be · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Metal Structural Defect Detection Based-On Deep Learning and Grad-Cam
Mehadjbia, A., & Slaoui-Hasnaoui, F. (2024) · International Conference on Circuit, Systems and Communication (ICCSC) · doi:10.1109/iccsc62074.2024.10617066 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Research on Defect Detection in Printing Barcode Area Based on Machine Learning
Qi, W., Liu, J., Li, Y., & Liu, J. (2024) · International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD) · doi:10.1109/icnc-fskd64080.2024.10702241 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Nagata, F., Sakata, S., Abe, R., Watanabe, K., & Habib, M. K. (2024) · AI Computer Science and Robotics Technology · doi:10.5772/acrt.20240043 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ahmed, S., Yoshiura, N., Hassan, S., & Khan, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81010-7_13 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Hierarchical Multi-Scale Feature Fusion-Based Classification Model for Metal Defects
Li, J., & Liu, J. (2025) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-025-10223-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Convolutional Network Research for Defect Identification of Productor Appearance Surface
Xie, X., & Shen, X. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11244218 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Visual Model of Pattern Design Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network
Ye, J., & Wang, J. (2024) · KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems · doi:10.3837/tiis.2024.02.003 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Reddy, N., & Khilar, R. (2025) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0259121 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hair Removal Methods in Skin Cancer Images Using Black Top Hat Transform and Wavelet Transform
Suryana, D. H., Mutiara, A. B., Raharja, W. K., & Riminarsih, D. (2024) · International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) · doi:10.1109/icic64337.2024.10957513 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zeng, L., Hu, J., Cai, S., Qin, M., & Wang, S. (2025) · steel research international · doi:10.1002/srin.202500002 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Defect Augmented Heritage-BIM For Masonry Structures Leveraging Deep Learning-Based Segmentation
Tong, X., Zhang, C., Zhou, J., & Sarno, L. D. (2026) · International Journal of Architectural Heritage · doi:10.1080/15583058.2026.2633538 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kalaiselvi, K., & Kasthuri, M. (2023) · Indian Journal of Science and Technology · doi:10.17485/ijst/v16i13.138 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Wang, W., Ren, Z., Wang, C., Lu, K., Tao, T., Pan, X., & Wang, B. (2024) · ISIJ International · doi:10.2355/isijinternational.isijint-2024-159 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zeng, L., Zheng, F., Chang, X., Chen, J. A., & Wang, S. (2024) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ad956b · Cited by 1 · see citing works
CNN Performances for Stunting Face Image Classification
Yunidar, Y., Roslidar, Yusni, Nasaruddin, N., & FitriArnia (2024) · doi:10.1109/icecos63900.2024.10791288 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Surface Defect Recognition of Steel Strip Based on Pluse Convolutional Neural Network
吴, 昊. (2023) · Modeling and Simulation · doi:10.12677/mos.2023.126474
Analysis and Mitigation of the Imbalance Impact on an Industrial Image Classification Dataset
Andrade, W. J., Lazzaretti, A. E., Kondo, R. E., Lopes, H. S., & de Oliveira, V. (2023) · Congresso Brasileiro de Inteligência Computacional (CBIC) · doi:10.21528/cbic2023-038
AUTOMATED METALLIC SURFACE FLAW INSPECTION USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES
Anwar, S. R., Thangarasu, N., Sahoo, G. S., & Saxena, K. (2024) · Proceedings on Engineering Sciences · doi:10.24874/pes.si.24.02.009
Kumar, S. P., & Balasubramanian, N. V. (2024) · Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219686724500392
Effective and Lightweight Surface Defect Detection via Enhanced Deep Learning Models
Kayanzari, K. P., Li, H.-Z., & Zhang, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825832
Research on Surface Defects Classification for PET Preform by Fusing Multi-Scale Features
Duan, C., Zhang, T., Han, L., & Tan, H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3589559
Ravi, A., & Kumari, G. R. N. (2025) · International Conference on Soft Computing for Security Applications (ICSCSA) · doi:10.1109/icscsa66339.2025.11171237
Wang, Z., Peng, C., Xing, Y., Zhang, L., Shao, Y., & Xuan, J. (2025) · International Conference on Equipment Intelligent Operation and Maintenance (ICEIOM) · doi:10.1109/iceiom65271.2025.11239829
Multi-scale Visual Feature Learning Framework for Metal Surface Defect Detection
Fu, B., Yang, X., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Lin, L., & Zhou, W. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS) · doi:10.1109/icus66297.2025.11294451
Hou, K., Li, R., Liu, H., Zhou, J., Liu, X., & Gao, H. (2026) · Engineering Research Express · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ae352c
Wei, J., Li, Z., Liu, Y., & Feng, X. (2026) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-026-02882-8
Brain Tumor Detection Using Vgg19 with Optuna-A Hyperparameter Optimization Technique
Srivastava, R., Gambhir, A., & Agrawal, R. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.06.426
Wang, G., Mao, S., Tang, F., Hu, W., & Xiang, J. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26144436
Martins, B., Pereira, L., & Azevedo, R. (2025) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Materials Science · doi:10.68159/i363294131
Ibrahim, S. J. A., Chakravarthy, N. S. K., Raja, R. A., Natarajan, Y., & Veerappan, K. N. G. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29319-0_14
Classification of weld surface defect by EfficientNetB4 and MobileNetV2 algorithm
M, V., Vellaichamy, R., Venish Kumar, T., Irudayaraj, S., Ram Kumaresh, H., & Beemaraj, R. K. (2026) · Interactions · doi:10.1007/s10751-026-02828-9
- Authors
- Wan, X., Zhang, X., & Liu, L.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Lilan
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-03-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2606
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3139248563
- Semantic Scholar
- c753ee1c4389c0e444469576747d8059560f2ed5
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- The construction of professional CPS test and verification bed for the application of steel rolling process (TC17085JH)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Keywords
- VGG19, transfer learning, class imbalance, image preprocessing, seam defects, defect classification, industrial machine vision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review