Single shot 2D3D image regisraton
Abstract
In this paper, we present a very deep, 11 weights layers, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) regression model for single shot and real-time 2D/3D registration. Different from optimization-based methods, which iteratively optimize the transformation parameters over a scalar-valued metric function representing the quality of the registration, the proposed method exploits the information embedded in the appearances of the Digitally Reconstructed Radiograph(DRR) and X-ray images and employs CNN regressors to directly estimate the transformation parameters. Unlike previous CNN approach which adopts an indirect way to cast the original complicated problem as several parts, we train a much deeper network to handle this registration problem by continuing to endeep the Convolutional Neural Network. To fit zooming in and out of DRRs more effectively we further more design a multi scale convolution kernel network. Our experiment results demonstrate the advantage of the proposed method in computational efficiency and accuracy. The research may indicate that powerful Convolutional Neural Network can learn the highly complex regression function that mapping the raw image data to the registration parameters thus achieve high accuracy and real-time in 2D/3D registration in a direct way.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ten studies that trained on synthetic data never meaningfully tested on real data.
“and perhaps worst, ten studies that trained on synthetic data never even tested (meaningfully) on real data (Hou et al., 2017, 2018; Pei et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2017; Bier et al., 2018; Foote et al., 2019; Guan et al., 2019; Yang and Chen, 2019; Neumann et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020).”
From The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Xie et al., 2017
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
A CNN Regression Approach for Real-Time 2D/3D Registration
Miao, S., Wang, Z. J., & Liao, R. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2521800 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unberath, M., Gao, C., Hu, Y., Judish, M., Taylor, R. H., Armand, M., & Grupp, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.716007 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xie, Y., Meng, C., Guan, S., & Wang, Q.
- Affiliations
- Beihang University (CN)
- Venue
- 2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W2794242446
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- 2D-3D registration, digitally reconstructed radiographs, X-ray images, transformation parameter estimation, multi-scale convolution kernels, real-time registration, deep convolutional neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review