The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Traffic Classification techniques and comparative analysis using Machine Learning algorithms
Abstract
Network Traffic Classification is a central topic nowadays in the field of computer science. It is a very essential task for Internet service providers (ISPs) to know which types of network applications flow in a network. Network Traffic Classification is the first step to analyze and identify different types of applications flowing in a network. Through this technique, internet service providers or network operators can manage the overall performance of a network. There are many methods traditional technique to classify internet traffic like Port Based, Pay Load Based and Machine Learning Based technique. The most common technique used these days is Machine Learning (ML) technique. Which is used by many researchers and got very effective accuracy results. In this paper, we discuss network traffic classification techniques step by step and real time internet data set is develop using network traffic capture tool, after that feature extraction tool is use to extract features from the capture traffic and then four machine learning classifiers Support Vector Machine, C4.5 decision tree, Naïve Bays and Bayes Net classifiers are applied. Experimental analysis shows that C4.5 classifiers gives very good accuracy result as compare to other classifies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward the Accurate Identification of Network Applications
Moore, A. W., & Papagiannaki, K. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31966-5_4 · Cited by 801
Cited by
Network Traffic Classifier With Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks for Internet of Things
Lopez-Martin, M., Carro, B., Sanchez-Esguevillas, A., & Lloret, J. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2747560 · Cited by 767
Shafiq, M., Tian, Z., Sun, Y., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.02.017 · Cited by 384
Self-citationIoT malicious traffic identification using wrapper-based feature selection mechanisms
Shafiq, M., Tian, Z., Bashir, A. K., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101863 · Cited by 266
Self-citationA Unified Deep Learning Anomaly Detection and Classification Approach for Smart Grid Environments
Siniosoglou, I., Radoglou-Grammatikis, P., Efstathopoulos, G., Fouliras, P., & Sarigiannidis, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2021.3078381 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Shafiq, M., Yu, X., Laghari, A. A., Yao, L., Karn, N. K., & Abdessamia, F.
- Venue
- 2016 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-10
- Pages
- 2451-2455
- OpenAlex
- W2613548641
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Traffic Classification techniques and comparative analysis using Machine Learning algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/compcomm.2016.7925139
- The paper
- Shafiq, M., Yu, X., Laghari, A. A., Yao, L., Karn, N. K., & Abdessamia, F. (2016). Network Traffic Classification techniques and comparative analysis using Machine Learning algorithms. 2016 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC). https://doi.org/10.1109/compcomm.2016.7925139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.