The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Unified Deep Learning Anomaly Detection and Classification Approach for Smart Grid Environments
Open accessAbstract
The interconnected and heterogeneous nature of the next-generation Electrical Grid (EG), widely known as Smart Grid (SG), bring severe cybersecurity and privacy risks that can also raise domino effects against other Critical Infrastructures (CIs). In this paper, we present an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) specially designed for the SG environments that use Modbus/Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and Distributed Network Protocol 3 (DNP3) protocols. The proposed IDS calledMENSA(anoMaly dEtection aNd claSsificAtion) adopts a novel Autoencoder-Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) architecture for (a) detecting operational anomalies and (b) classifying Modbus/TCP and DNP3 cyberattacks. In particular,MENSAcombines the aforementioned Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in a common architecture, taking into account the adversarial loss and the reconstruction difference. The proposed IDS is validated in four real SG evaluation environments, namely (a) SG lab, (b) substation, (c) hydropower plant and (d) power plant, solving successfully an outlier detection (i.e., anomaly detection) problem as well as a challenging multiclass classification problem consisting of 14 classes (13 Modbus/TCP cyberattacks and normal instances). Furthermore,MENSAcan discriminate five cyberattacks against DNP3. The evaluation results demonstrate the efficiency ofMENSAcompared to other Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods in terms of Accuracy, False Positive Rate (FPR), True Positive Rate (TPR) and the F1 score.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications
Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.04861 · Cited by 19,015
Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2008) · 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2008.17 · Cited by 6,601
ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method
Zeiler, M. D. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5701 · Cited by 5,322
Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overview
Creswell, A., White, T., Dumoulin, V., Arulkumaran, K., Sengupta, B., & Bharath, A. A. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2765202 · Cited by 4,540
A Fast Algorithm for the Minimum Covariance Determinant Estimator
Rousseeuw, P. J., & Driessen, K. V. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485670 · Cited by 2,708
Deep learning for cyber security intrusion detection: Approaches, datasets, and comparative study
Ferrag, M. A., Maglaras, L., Moschoyiannis, S., & Janicke, H. (2020) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102419 · Cited by 1,130
He, Y., Mendis, G. J., & Wei, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2017.2703842 · Cited by 834
A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber-physical systems
Mitchell, R., & Chen, I.-R. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2542049 · Cited by 768
A Survey on the Detection Algorithms for False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids
Musleh, A. S., Chen, G., & Dong, Z. Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2019.2949998 · Cited by 714
Williams, N., Zander, S., & Armitage, G. (2006) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/1163593.1163596 · Cited by 698
Cited by
Li, G., & Jung, J. J. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.008 · Cited by 361
Enhanced Modbus/TCP Security Protocol: Authentication and Authorization Functions Supported
Martins, T., & Oliveira, S. V. G. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22208024 · Cited by 45
“The intrusion detection system (IDS) for smart grid is presented in [24,25].”
A Comprehensive Survey on Generative AI Solutions in IoT Security
López Delgado, J. L., & López Ramos, J. A. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13244965 · Cited by 33
Du, Y., Huang, Y., Wan, G., & He, P. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10224373 · Cited by 24
An intrusion detection system for critical infrastructures: Modbus approach
Varol, M., & İskefiyeli, M. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112410 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Siniosoglou, I., Radoglou-Grammatikis, P., Efstathopoulos, G., Fouliras, P., & Sarigiannidis, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1137-1151
- ISSN
- 1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 2373-7379
- OpenAlex
- W3163895120
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 17.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Unified Deep Learning Anomaly Detection and Classification Approach for Smart Grid Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsm.2021.3078381
- The paper
- Siniosoglou, I., Radoglou-Grammatikis, P., Efstathopoulos, G., Fouliras, P., & Sarigiannidis, P. (2021). A Unified Deep Learning Anomaly Detection and Classification Approach for Smart Grid Environments. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsm.2021.3078381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.