The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network performance evaluation using frame size and quality traces of single-layer and two-layer video: A tutorial
Abstract
Video traffic is widely expected to account for a large portion of the traffic in future wireline and wireless networks, as multimedia applications are becoming increasingly popular. Consequently, the performance evaluation of networking architectures, protocols, and mechanisms for video traffic becomes increasingly important. Video traces, which give the sizes, deadlines, and qualities of the individual video frames in a video sequence, have been emerging as convenient video characterizations for networking studies. In this tutorial we give an introduction to the use of video traces in networking studies. First we give a brief overview of digital video and its encoding and playout. Then we present a library of traces of single- and two-layer encoded video. We discuss the statistical properties of the traces and the resulting implications for the transport of video over networks. Finally we discuss the factors that need to be considered when using video traces in network performance evaluations. In particular, we introduce performance metrics that quantify the quality of the delivered video. We outline a procedure for generating video load for network simulations from the traces, and discuss how to meaningfully analyze the outcomes of these simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulation modeling and analysis
(1999) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/s0278-6125(99)90119-x · Cited by 3,833
Web caching and Zipf-like distributions: evidence and implications
Breslau, L., Cao, P., Fan, L., Phillips, G., & Shenker, S. (1999) · IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320) · doi:10.1109/infcom.1999.749260 · Cited by 3,467
JPEG2000: Image Compression Fundamentals, Standards and Practice
Taubman, D. S. (2002) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.1469618 · Cited by 3,159
Statistics for Long-Memory Processes.
Ray, W. D., & Beran, J. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2983481 · Cited by 2,686
Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology
Chao, Y. R., & Zipf, G. K. (1950) · Language · doi:10.2307/409735 · Cited by 2,193
Error control and concealment for video communication: a review
Wang, Y., & Zhu, Q.-F. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.664283 · Cited by 1,359
Multiple description coding: compression meets the network
Goyal, V. K. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.952806 · Cited by 1,344
Analysis, modeling and generation of self-similar VBR video traffic
Garrett, M. W., & Willinger, W. (1994) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/190809.190339 · Cited by 953
Specification of Guaranteed Quality of Service
Shenker, S., Partridge, C., & Guerin, R. (1997) · doi:10.17487/rfc2212 · Cited by 941
Overview of fine granularity scalability in MPEG-4 video standard
Li, W. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/76.911157 · Cited by 917
Cited by
Testolin, A., Zanforlin, M., De Filippo De Grazia, M., Munaretto, D., Zanella, A., Zorzi, M., & Zorzi, M. (2014) · 2014 13th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MED-HOC-NET) · doi:10.1109/medhocnet.2014.6849102 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Seeling, P., Reisslein, M., & Kulapala, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 58-78
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W2116856247
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 23.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network performance evaluation using frame size and quality traces of single-layer and two-layer video: A tutorial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2004.5342293
- The paper
- Seeling, P., Reisslein, M., & Kulapala, B. (2004). Network performance evaluation using frame size and quality traces of single-layer and two-layer video: A tutorial. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2004.5342293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
