Cited by 45Image and Video Quality AssessmentAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control

A machine learning approach to QoE-based video admission control and resource allocation in wireless systems

Open access
Testolin, Alberto, Zanforlin, Marco, De Filippo De Grazia, Michele, Munaretto, Daniele, Zanella, Andrea, Zorzi, Marco, Zorzi, Michele·2014·2014 13th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MED-HOC-NET)

Abstract

The rapid growth of video traffic in cellular networks is a crucial issue to be addressed by mobile operators. An emerging and promising trend in this regard is the development of solutions that aim at maximizing the Quality of Experience (QoE) of the end users. However, predicting the QoE perceived by the users in different conditions remains a major challenge. In this paper, we propose a machine learning approach to support QoE-based Video Admission Control (VAC) and Resource Management (RM) algorithms. More specifically, we develop a learning system that can automatically extract the quality-rate characteristics of unknown video sequences from the size of H.264-encoded video frames. Our approach combines unsupervised feature learning with supervised classification techniques, thereby providing an efficient and scalable way to estimate the QoE parameters that characterize each video. This QoE characterization is then used to manage simultaneous video transmissions through a shared channel in order to guarantee a minimum quality level to the final users. Simulation results show that the proposed learning-based QoE classification of video sequences outperforms commonly deployed off-line video analysis techniques and that the QoE-based VAC and RM algorithms outperform standard content-agnostic strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/medhocnet.2014.6849102

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Testolin, A., Zanforlin, M., De Filippo De Grazia, M., Munaretto, D., Zanella, A., Zorzi, M., & Zorzi, M.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
2014 13th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MED-HOC-NET)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
31-38
OpenAlex
W2107330855
Cited by
45
References
24
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
Keywords
resource allocation, quality of experience, QoE prediction, H.264 video, video traffic, cellular networks, unsupervised feature learning, supervised classification, shared channel, machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review