The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Security in Software Defined Networks: A Survey
Abstract
Software defined networking (SDN) decouples the network control and data planes. The network intelligence and state are logically centralized and the underlying network infrastructure is abstracted from applications. SDN enhances network security by means of global visibility of the network state where a conflict can be easily resolved from the logically centralized control plane. Hence, the SDN architecture empowers networks to actively monitor traffic and diagnose threats to facilitates network forensics, security policy alteration, and security service insertion. The separation of the control and data planes, however, opens security challenges, such as man-in-the middle attacks, denial of service (DoS) attacks, and saturation attacks. In this paper, we analyze security threats to application, control, and data planes of SDN. The security platforms that secure each of the planes are described followed by various security approaches for network-wide security in SDN. SDN security is analyzed according to security dimensions of the ITU-T recommendation, as well as, by the costs of security solutions. In a nutshell, this paper highlights the present and future security challenges in SDN and future directions for secure SDN.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · doi:10.1145/2342441.2342452 · Cited by 426
Dynamic Controller Provisioning in Software Defined Networks
Bari, M. F., Roy, A. R., Chowdhury, S. R., Zhang, Q., Zhani, M. F., Ahmed, R., & Boutaba, R. (2013) · Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM 2013) · doi:10.1109/cnsm.2013.6727805 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Mobile edge computing, Fog et al.: A survey and analysis of security threats and challenges
Roman, R., Lopez, J., & Mambo, M. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.11.009 · Cited by 1,338
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2866942 · Cited by 700
Khan, R., Kumar, P., Jayakody, D. N. K., & Liyanage, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2933899 · Cited by 572
Overview of 5G Security Challenges and Solutions
Ahmad, I., Kumar, T., Liyanage, M., Okwuibe, J., Ylianttila, M., & Gurtov, A. (2018) · IEEE Communications Standards Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcomstd.2018.1700063 · Cited by 448
Self-citationBlockchain for 5G and beyond networks: A state of the art survey
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102693 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, I., Namal, S., Ylianttila, M., & Gurtov, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2317-2346
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W2112700013
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 54.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Security in Software Defined Networks: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2015.2474118
- The paper
- Ahmad, I., Namal, S., Ylianttila, M., & Gurtov, A. (2015). Security in Software Defined Networks: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2015.2474118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.