Cited by 700Software-Defined Networks and 5GAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesCaching and Content Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 271 of the 274 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Software Defined Networking (SDN): Research Issues and Challenges

Xie, Junfeng, Yu, F. Richard, Huang, Tao, Xie, Renchao, Liu, Jiang, Wang, Chenmeng, Liu, Yunjie·2019·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

In recent years, with the rapid development of current Internet and mobile communication technologies, the infrastructure, devices and resources in networking systems are becoming more complex and heterogeneous. In order to efficiently organize, manage, maintain and optimize networking systems, more intelligence needs to be deployed. However, due to the inherently distributed feature of traditional networks, machine learning techniques are hard to be applied and deployed to control and operate networks. Software defined networking (SDN) brings us new chances to provide intelligence inside the networks. The capabilities of SDN (e.g., logically centralized control, global view of the network, software-based traffic analysis, and dynamic updating of forwarding rules) make it easier to apply machine learning techniques. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey on the literature involving machine learning algorithms applied to SDN. First, the related works and background knowledge are introduced. Then, we present an overview of machine learning algorithms. In addition, we review how machine learning algorithms are applied in the realm of SDN, from the perspective of traffic classification, routing optimization, quality of service/quality of experience prediction, resource management and security. Finally, challenges and broader perspectives are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2018.2866942

Cites

271 of 271 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 274 references

3 of the 274 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 2016, Common Information Model Overview V1 1
  2. blenk, 2017, O’Zapft is: Tap your network algorithm’s big data!, Proc ACM Big-DAMA, 19
  3. 2013, Ryu Sdn Framework
  4. 2012, Project Floodlight Open Source Software for Building Software Defined Networks
  5. 2018, Indigo Open source openflow switches
  6. 2018, Pantou OpenFlow 1 3 for OpenWRT
  7. mccauley, 2013, About POX
  8. 2018, Geant network
  9. 2009, OpenFlow Switch Specification Version 1 0 of OpenFlow
  10. ibrahim, 2017, SDN-based intrusion detection system, Infoteh-Jahorina, 16, 621
  11. jiang, 2017, Autonomic network management for software-defined and virtualized 5G systems, Proc of VDE European Wireless, 1
  12. basterrech, 2016, A tutorial about random neural networks in supervised learning, arXiv preprint arXiv 1609 09861
  13. kumar, 2015, Implementation and comparison of decision tree based algorithms, Int J Innov Adv Comput Sci, 4, 190
  14. 2018, LongTail Log Analysis Dashboard
  15. 2018, UNB ISCX Intrusion Detection Evaluation DataSet
  16. 2018, ImageNet database
  17. mccauley, 2013, Extending SDN to large-scale networks, Proc Open Netw Summit, 1
  18. agrawal, 1981, When Machine Learning Meets AI and Game Theory, 1
  19. 2014, Open Networking Foundation
  20. 2018, Open Vswitch
  21. lee, 2013, Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks, Proc Workshop Challenges Represent Learn (ICML), 3, 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 700

Metadata

Authors
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2019
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
393-430
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
OpenAlex
W2915905517
Cited by
700
References
274
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 45
FWCI
42.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61501042)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Optical Network Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
Keywords
software-defined networking, network traffic classification, route optimization, quality of service prediction, quality of experience prediction, network resource management, network security, centralized network control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review