Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Key Management Systems for Smart Grid Advanced Metering Infrastructure: A Survey

Open access
Ghosal, Amrita, Conti, Mauro·2019·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

Smart grids are evolving as the next generation power systems that transform the traditional ways of functioning of present electrical grids. Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) is one of the key components in smart grids. An AMI comprises of systems and networks, that are responsible for collecting and analyzing data received from smart meters. In addition, AMI also manages the different applications related with power and services based on the data collected from smart meters. Thus, AMI plays a significant role in the smooth functioning of smart grids. Malicious adversaries have immense opportunities for attacking the AMI, as it is made up of systems that are highly vulnerable to such attacks. Providing security to AMI is necessary as adversaries can cause potential infrastructural damage and privacy threats in smart grid. One of the most effective and challenging topic's identified, is the key management system (KMS), for sustaining the security concerns in AMI. Therefore, KMS seeks to be a promising research area for future development of AMI. To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first to highlight the significance of KMS for the security point of view for AMI in smart grids. We believe that we have taken here the needed initiatives that will help understand the importance of key management in AMI security, and strengthen future research works carried out in this area. This survey highlights the key security issues of AMIs and focuses on how key management techniques can be utilized for safeguarding AMI. At first, we discuss the main features of AMIs, the deployment scenario of smart grids and identify the relationship between smart grid and AMI. Then, we explore the main features of AMI, and also introduce the security issues and challenges. We also provide a discussion on the role of key management in AMI, and point out the differences between traditional electrical systems and smart grids. We then classify and provide a review of the existing works in literature that deal with secure KMS in AMI. Finally, we summarize the possible future open research issues and challenges of KMS in AMI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2019.2907650

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Ghosal, A., & Conti, M.
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2019
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
2831-2848
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
OpenAlex
W2805092202
Cited by
267
References
62
FWCI
19.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key Management Systems for Smart Grid Advanced Metering Infrastructure: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2019.2907650
The paper
Ghosal, A., & Conti, M. (2019). Key Management Systems for Smart Grid Advanced Metering Infrastructure: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2907650

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.