Cited by 152IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AINetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

Secure Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Smart-World Critical Infrastructures: Survey, Case Study and Research Opportunities

Open access
Liu, Xing, Qian, Cheng, Hatcher, William Grant, Xu, Hansong, Liao, Weixian, Yu, Wei·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

The widespread adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) technologies has drastically increased the breadth and depth of attack surfaces in networked systems, providing new mechanisms for the intrusion. In the context of smart-world critical infrastructures and cyber-physical systems, the rapid adoption of the IoT systems and infrastructures without thorough consideration for the risks and vulnerabilities has the potential for catastrophic damage to the privacy, safety, and security of individuals and corporations. While the IoT systems have the potential to increase productivity, accountability, traceability, and efficiency, their potential weaknesses are also more abundant. In this paper, we provide critical consideration of the security of the IoT systems as applied to smart-world critical infrastructures. Particularly, we carry out a detailed assessment of vulnerabilities in IoT-based critical infrastructures from the perspectives of applications, networking, operating systems, software, firmware, and hardware. In addition, we highlight the three key critical infrastructure IoT-based cyber-physical systems, namely the smart transportation, smart manufacturing, and smart grid. Moreover, we provide a broad collection of attack examples upon each of the key applications. Furthermore, we introduce a case study, in which we assess the impacts of potential attacks on critical IoT-based systems, using the smart transportation system as an example. Finally, we provide a set of best practices and address the necessary steps to enact countermeasures for any generic IoT-based critical infrastructure system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2920763

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emergence of the IoT in ICS has led to new security challenges, which will require newly developed expertise to prepare for a wide variety of attacks that may emerge from the integration of these systems.

    “The emergence of the IoT in ICS has led to new security challenges, which will require newly developed expertise to prepare for a wide variety of attacks that may emerge from the integration of these systems [65,66,67,68,69].”

    From Impact, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigation Strategies for Cyber-Secure Critical Infrastructure. (2023) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes IoT vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, including industrial systems, and calls for investigating a range of attacks and developing countermeasures. The Defensive Schemes section (page unavailable) calls for security best practices and further work, but does not say that newly developed expertise is required. That part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. H. Xu, J. Lin, and W. Yu, Secure and Trustworthy Transportation Cyber- Physical Systems. 2017, pp. 23-49.
  2. C.-S. Wang and P. Li, ''Development and challenges of distributed gen- eration, the micro-grid and smart distribution system,'' Automat. Electr. Power Syst., vol. 34, pp. 10-14 and 23, 2010.
  3. A. N. Upadhyaya and J. Shah, ''Attacks on VANET security,'' Int. J. Comput. Eng. Inf. Tech., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 8-19, 2018.
  4. H. Noori, ''Realistic urban traffic simulation as vehicular Ad-hoc network (VANET) via Veins framework,'' in Proc. 12th Conf. Open Innov. Assoc. (FRUCT), Nov. 2012, pp. 1-7.
  5. W. Yu, ''False data injection attacks in smart grid: Challenges and solu- tions,'' in Proc. NIST Cyber Secur. Cyber-Phys. Syst. Workshop (CPS), 2012, pp. 1-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Qian, C., Hatcher, W. G., Xu, H., Liao, W., & Yu, W.
Affiliations
Towson University (US)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
79523-79544
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948502305
Cited by
152
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS 1350145)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
Internet of Things security, critical infrastructure, smart world, cyber-physical systems, IoT vulnerabilities, smart transportation, smart manufacturing, smart grid, security countermeasures, best practices, operating system vulnerabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review