Cited by 108Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Network Security and Intrusion DetectionAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 220 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine Learning for Security in Vehicular Networks: A Comprehensive Survey

Open access
Talpur, Anum, Gurusamy, Mohan·2022·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) has emerged as an attractive and viable technique to provide effective solutions for a wide range of application domains. An important application domain is vehicular networks wherein ML-based approaches are found to be very useful to address various problems. The use of wireless communication between vehicular nodes and/or infrastructure makes it vulnerable to different types of attacks. In this regard, ML and its variants are gaining popularity to detect attacks and deal with different kinds of security issues in vehicular communication. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of ML-based techniques for different security issues in vehicular networks. We first briefly introduce the basics of vehicular networks and different types of communications. Apart from the traditional vehicular networks, we also consider modern vehicular network architectures. We propose a taxonomy of security attacks in vehicular networks and discuss various security challenges and requirements. We classify the ML techniques developed in the literature according to their use in vehicular network applications. We explain the solution approaches and working principles of these ML techniques in addressing various security challenges and provide insightful discussion. The limitations and challenges in using ML-based methods in vehicular networks are discussed. Finally, we present observations and lessons learned before we conclude our work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2021.3129079

Cites

217 of 217 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 220 references

3 of the 220 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 2006, NGSIM Dataset
  2. 1999, Kdd Cup 1999 Dataset
  3. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2820039 · DOI
  4. liang, 2018, Deep reinforcement learning for traffic light control in vehicular networks, arXiv 1803 11115
  5. kleinbaum, 2002, Logistic Regression
  6. 10.1109/TITS.2019.2962338 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/COMST.2020.2986444 · DOI · Paper page
  8. öztürk, 2012, Driver Status Identification from Driving Behavior Signals, 31
  9. anderson, 1992, Artificial neural networks technology, 258, 1
  10. 10.1109/GLOCOM.2018.8647927 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Talpur, A., & Gurusamy, M.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2022
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
346-379
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
OpenAlex
W3167949380
Cited by
107
References
220
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
vehicular networks, VANET security, machine learning for security, attack detection, vehicular communication, security challenges, security requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review