The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outlier Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks using Bayesian Belief Networks
Abstract
Data reliability is an important issue from the user's perspective, in the context of streamed data in wireless sensor networks (WSN). Reliability is affected by the harsh environmental conditions, interferences in wireless medium and usage of low quality sensors. Due to these conditions, the data generated by the sensors may get corrupted resulting in outliers and missing values. Deciding whether an observation is an outlier or not depends on the behavior of the neighbors' readings as well as the readings of the sensor itself. This can be done by capturing the spatio-temporal correlations that exists among the observations of the sensor nodes. By using naive Bayesian networks for classification, we can estimate whether an observation belongs to a class or not. If it falls beyond the range of the class, then it can be detected as an outlier. However naive Bayesian networks do not consider the conditional dependencies among the observations of sensor attributes. So, we propose an outlier detection scheme based on Bayesian belief networks, which captures the conditional dependencies among the observations of the attributes to detect the outliers in the sensor streamed data. Applicability of this scheme as a plug-in to the component oriented middleware for sensor networks (COMiS) of our early research work is also presented
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335388 · Cited by 5,207
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/342009.335388 · Cited by 4,149
Multiple imputation after 18+ years
Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908 · Cited by 4,072
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Cited by
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L. (2014) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026 · Cited by 1,649
Machine learning in wireless sensor networks: Algorithms, strategies, and applications
Alsheikh, M. A., Lin, S., Niyato, D., & Tan, H.-P. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2320099 · Cited by 965
Fadlullah, Z. M., Tang, F., Mao, B., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2707140 · Cited by 810
Himeur, Y., Ghanem, K., Alsalemi, A., Bensaali, F., & Amira, A. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116601 · Cited by 660
Metadata
- Authors
- Janakiram, D., Kumar, A. V. U. P., & Reddy V., A. M.
- Venue
- 2006 1st International Conference on Communication Systems Software & Middleware
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W1559384589
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outlier Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks using Bayesian Belief Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comswa.2006.1665221
- The paper
- Janakiram, D., Kumar, A. V. U. P., & Reddy V., A. M. (2006). Outlier Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks using Bayesian Belief Networks. 2006 1st International Conference on Communication Systems Software & Middleware. https://doi.org/10.1109/comswa.2006.1665221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.