Cited by 1,649Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningArtificial Immune Systems Applications

A review of novelty detection

Pimentel, Marco A.F., Clifton, David A., Clifton, Lei, Tarassenko, Lionel·2014·Signal Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026

Cites

311 of 311 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 322 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Pimentel, Marco A.F.
Venue
Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
99
Pages
215-249
ISSN
0165-1684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115627867
Cited by
1,649
References
322
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 199 · 2020: 219 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 162 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 17
FWCI
77.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
Keywords
novelty detection, one-class classification, anomaly detection, critical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review