Cited by 42Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionComputer Science and EngineeringAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

Image encryption using hybrid chaotic map

Abdullah, Hikmat N., Abdullah, Hamsa A.·2017·2017 International Conference on Current Research in Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCIT)

Abstract

Recently, great attention is paid to the use of chaotic maps in image encryption applications due to their excellent randomness properties. In this paper, an efficient image encryption algorithm using a set of chaotic maps has been proposed. The proposed algorithm consists of three stages: confusion, shuffling, and diffusion. In confusion stage, the original image is confused by using Arnold cat chaotic map. In shuffling stage, the pixels of the confused image are shuffled to add more randomness and unpredictability. Finally, the shuffled image is diffused by a key image generated by combining sequences generated from Henon and Logistic chaotic maps. To evaluate the performance, MATLAB Simulations are done for both the proposed algorithm and some existing algorithms in the literature while histogram, Number of Pixel Change Rate (NPCR), correlation, Unified Average Changing Intensity (UACI), and information entropy measures are used for security analysis. The simulation results and security analysis have demonstrated that the proposed encryption system is robust and flexible. For example the amount of entropy obtained by the proposed algorithm is 7.9975, which is very closed its ideal amount: 8, and NPCR is 99.66 %, which is also much closed to its ideal value: 100%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/crcsit.2017.7965545

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hybrid chaotic map has better security measurement parameters than the standalone chaos-based image encryption system.

    “The hybrid chaotic map seems to have better security measurement parameters than the standalone chaos-based image encryption system.”
  • Test images from the SIPI and DICOM databases are standard images chosen by most existing works to evaluate image encryption algorithms.

    “Test images were taken from a widely used image repository called the “SIPI image database” [32], and the “DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) image database” [33], because these are the standard image chosen by most of the existing works [21,31] to evaluate the strength of image encryption algorithms.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdullah, H. N., & Abdullah, H. A.
Affiliations
Nahrain University (IQ)
Venue
2017 International Conference on Current Research in Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCIT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-04
Pages
121-125
OpenAlex
W2727230610
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Current Research in Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCIT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Keywords
image encryption, chaotic maps, Arnold cat map, Henon map, logistic map, pixel shuffling, diffusion, key images, NPCR, UACI, Shannon entropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review