Cited by 53Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisImage and Video Quality Assessment

Effective and Fast DeepFake Detection Method Based on Haar Wavelet Transform

Younus, Mohammed Akram, Hasan, Taha Mohammed·2020·2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSASE)

Abstract

DeepFake using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) tampered videos reveals a new challenge in today's life. With the inception of GANs, generating high-quality fake videos becomes much easier and in a very realistic manner. Therefore, the development of efficient tools that can automatically detect these fake videos is of paramount importance. The proposed DeepFake detection method takes the advantage of the fact that current DeepFake generation algorithms cannot generate face images with varied resolutions, it is only able to generate new faces with a limited size and resolution, a further distortion and blur is needed to match and fit the fake face with the background and surrounding context in the source video. This transformation causes exclusive blur inconsistency between the generated face and its background in the outcome DeepFake videos, in turn, these artifacts can be effectively spotted by examining the edge pixels in the wavelet domain of the faces in each frame compared to the rest of the frame. A blur inconsistency detection scheme relied on the type of edge and the analysis of its sharpness using Haar wavelet transform as shown in this paper, by using this feature, it can determine if the face region in a video has been blurred or not and to what extent it has been blurred. Thus will lead to the detection of DeepFake videos. The effectiveness of the proposed scheme is demonstrated in the experimental results where the “UADFV” dataset has been used for the eva…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/csase48920.2020.9142077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent works on adversarial perturbation attacks to fool DNN-based detectors make the deepfake detection task more difficult.

    “Recent works on adversarial perturbation attacks to fool DNN-based detectors make the deepfake detection task more difficult [157, 171–174].”

    From Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey (2022) · cites this paper as [171]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Younus, M. A., & Hasan, T. M.
Affiliations
University of Diyala (IQ)
Venue
2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSASE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-04
Pages
186-190
OpenAlex
W3043392332
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
Keywords
deepfake detection, video forgery detection, Haar wavelet transform, edge sharpness, generative adversarial networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review