PreprintCited by 467Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMisinformation and Its Impacts

Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Survey

Open access
Nguyen, Thanh Thi, Nguyen, Quoc Viet Hung, Nguyen, Dung Tien, Nguyen, Duc Thanh, Huynh-The, Thien, Nahavandi, Saeid, Nguyen, Thanh Tam, Pham, Quoc-Viet +1 more·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Deep learning has been successfully applied to solve various complex problems ranging from big data analytics to computer vision and human-level control. Deep learning advances however have also been employed to create software that can cause threats to privacy, democracy and national security. One of those deep learning-powered applications recently emerged is deepfake. Deepfake algorithms can create fake images and videos that humans cannot distinguish them from authentic ones. The proposal of technologies that can automatically detect and assess the integrity of digital visual media is therefore indispensable. This paper presents a survey of algorithms used to create deepfakes and, more importantly, methods proposed to detect deepfakes in the literature to date. We present extensive discussions on challenges, research trends and directions related to deepfake technologies. By reviewing the background of deepfakes and state-of-the-art deepfake detection methods, this study provides a comprehensive overview of deepfake techniques and facilitates the development of new and more robust methods to deal with the increasingly challenging deepfakes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1909.11573

Cites

171 of 171 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deepfakes can be employed to generate counterfeit satellite earth images with military implications.

    “Remarkably, deepfakes can even be employed to generate counterfeit satellite earth images with military implications (Nguyen et al. 2019).”

    From Deepfakes: current and future trends (2024) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al. 2019

  • A review of deep RL approaches for cyber-security problems can be found in Nguyen et al. (2019), including autonomous intrusion detection techniques and multiagent game theory simulations for defense strategies.

    “A review of deep RL approaches developed for solving cyber-security problems can be found in Nguyen et al. (2019), including autonomous intrusion detection techniques and multiagent game theory simulations for defense strategies.”

    From Deepfakes: current and future trends (2024) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al. (2019)

    The Abstract and §3, “Deepfake Detection” (pages not provided), describe a survey of deepfake creation and detection methods. Searches for deep reinforcement learning, cyber-security, intrusion detection, and multiagent game theory found no passage addressing the attributed review or examples. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 173 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bin Guo, Yasan Ding, Lina Yao, Yunji Liang, and Zhiwen Yu. The future of false information detection on social media: New perspectives and trends. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53 (4):1-36, 2020.
  2. Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. Wasser- stein generative adversarial networks. In International Confer- ence on Machine Learning, pages 214-223. PMLR, 2017.
  3. Diederik P Kingma and Prafulla Dhariwal. Glow: genera- tive flow with invertible 1× 1 convolutions. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 10236-10245, 2018.
  4. Marissa Koopman, Andrea Macarulla Rodriguez, and Zeno Geradts. Detection of deepfake video manipulation. In The 20th Irish Machine Vision and Image Processing Conference (IMVIP), pages 133-136, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., Nguyen, T. T., Pham, Q.-V., & Nguyen, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Pusan National University (KR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
223
Pages
103525-103525
ISSN
1077-3142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288102863
Cited by
464
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 138 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
30.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Vision and Image Understanding (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfakes, deepfake detection, deepfake generation, synthetic media, video forgery, image tampering, deep learning applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review