An Evaluation of a Mobile Game Concept for Lectures
Abstract
This paper describes an evaluation of a new game concept, Lecture Quiz, which can be used in lectures in higher education to promote strong student participation and variation in how lectures are taught. The lecture game uses the equipment and infrastructure already available in lecture halls like the teacher’s portable PC, a large screen and a video projector, network connections, and the students’ mobile phones. The main game runs on the teacher’s portable PC projected on a large screen, whereas the students will interact with the game using their own mobile phones. Lecture Quiz is a multiplayer quiz game, which offers a variation in game modes where unlimited number of players can play simultaneously. Games like Lecture Quiz are most useful for testing and rehearsing theory. As a bonus, the teacher will get quantitative data on how much of the theory the students actually have learned. The evaluation of Lecture Quiz was performed in a software architecture lecture where twenty students first played the game and then were asked to fill in an evaluation form. The focus of the evaluation was on usability of the system and the perceived usefulness of using Lecture Quiz in lectures. The results of the evaluation show that Lecture Quiz was easy to use and that it contributed to increased learning. Further, Lecture Quiz was perceived as entertaining, and half of the students claimed they would attend more lectures if such systems were used regularly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Experiments with early Lecture Quiz prototypes showed that Lecture Quiz increased student motivation, engagement, and perceived learning through entertaining social learning activities.
“Experiments with the early prototypes showed that Lecture Quiz increased student motivation, engagement, and perceived learning through entertaining social learning activities (Wang, Øfsdal, & Mørch-Storstein, 2008;Wu, Wang, Børresen, & Tidemann, 2011).”
From The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Wang, Øfsdal, & Mørch-Storstein, 2008
Cites
SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale
(1996) · Usability Evaluation In Industry · doi:10.1201/9781498710411-35 · Cited by 8,989 · see citing works
Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., Correa, M., Flores, P., Grau, V., Lagos, F., López, X., López, V., et al. (2003) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(02)00099-4 · Cited by 699 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The main game runs on the teacher’s portable PC projected on a large screen, whereas the students will interact with the game using their own mobile phones.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review
Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Self-citationThe wear out effect of a game-based student response system
Wang, A. I. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Self-citationKahoot, A New and Cheap Way to Get Classroom-Response Instead of Using Clickers
Cutri, R., Marim, L., Cordeiro, J., Gil, H., & Guerald, C. (2016) · 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings · doi:10.18260/p.25512 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, A. I., Øfsdahl, T., & Mørch-Storstein, O. K.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- ORCID
- Wang, Alf Inge
- Venue
- 2008 21st Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-04
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 1093-0175 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160966756
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- mobile games, game-based learning, lecture-based learning, student participation, mobile phones in education, usability evaluation, perceived usefulness, software architecture education, university teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review