CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Innovative Teaching MethodsEducational Games and GamificationTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Kahoot, A New and Cheap Way to Get Classroom-Response Instead of Using Clickers

Open access
Cutri, Rodrigo, Marim, Luiz, Cordeiro, Juliana, Gil, Hector, Guerald, Camila·2016·2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
DOI 10.18260/p.25512
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Kahoot, a new and cheap way to get classroom-response instead of using

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18260/p.25512

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stage of the game where correct answers are hidden until all students have given their answers creates a suspension that can increase enjoyment, motivation, and concentration.

    “This stage of the game creates a suspension that can increase enjoyment, motivation, and concentration”

    From The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Cutri et al., 2016

    The paper’s Final considerations report that students found Kahoot fun and that it increased attention and motivation; Best practices in Kahoot use also says short quizzes kept students motivated. But How Kahoot works describes immediate feedback after each question, not suspense created by withholding correct answers until everyone responds. The paper does not link that specific stage to enjoyment, motivation, or concentration. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. DEGRAZIA, J., & WEIMER, A., & FALCONER, J. L. (2005, June), The Use Of Clickers In The Engineering Classroom Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/15116
  2. ESCHENBACH, T., & LEWIS, N., & NICHOLLS, G. M., & PALLIS, J. M. (2013, June), The Impact of Clickers on Your Classroom and Your Career Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/22590
  3. HUNG, W. P. (2011, June), Clicker Clicks It Paper presented at 2011 Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/17611
  4. PROBST, D. (2009, June), Effectiveness Of Using Personal Response Systems In A Conceptual Physics Course Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/4798
  5. ROUX, D., & CZEKANSKI, A. (2009, June), A Revisited Study On The Use Of Clicker Technology To Evaluate Short Term Concept Retention Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/5044
  6. VAN DEN EINDE, L., & LEE, S. H., & LE, J. L. (2012, June), Incorporating Clickers and Peer Instruction into Large Structural Engineering Classrooms Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21516
  7. LAPP, M., & RINGENBERG, J., & SUMMERS, K. J., & CHIVUKULA, A. S., & FLESZAR, J. (2011, June), The Mobile Participation System: Not Just Another Clicker Paper presented at 2011 Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/18437

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Cutri, R., Marim, L., Cordeiro, J., Gil, H., & Guerald, C.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia (BR)
  • American Society For Engineering Education (US)
ORCID
Venue
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
Publisher
ASEE Conferences
Published
2016-07-06
DOI
10.18260/p.25512
OpenAlex
W2617020043
Cited by
28
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
13.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
Kahoot, clickers, student engagement, low-cost technology, gamification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review