The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Cassandra: flexible trust management, applied to electronic health records
Abstract
We study the specification of access control policy in large-scale distributed systems. We present Cassandra, a language and system for expressing policy, and the results of a substantial case study, a security policy for a national Electronic Health Record system, based on the requirements for the ongoing UK National Health Service procurement exercise. Cassandra policies are expressed in a language based on Datalog with constraints. The expressiveness of the lan-guage (and its computational complexity) can be tuned by choosing an appropriate constraint domain. Cassandra is role-based; it supports credential-based access control (e.g. between administrative domains); and rules can refer to re-mote policies (for automatic credential retrieval and trust negotiation). Moreover, the policy language is small, and it has a formal semantics for query evaluation and for the access control engine. For the case study we choose a constraint domain C0 that is sufficiently expressive to encode many policy idioms. The case study turns out to require many subtle variants of these; it is important to express this variety smoothly, rather than add them as ad hoc features. By ensuring only a constraint compact fragment of C0 is used, we guarantee a finite and computable fixed-point model. We use a top-down evalua-tion algorithm, for efficiency and to guarantee termination. The case study (with some 310 rules and 58 roles) demon-strates that this language is expressive enough for a real-world application; preliminary results suggest that the per-formance should be acceptable. 1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications
Barth, A., Datta, A., Mitchell, J. C., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P'06) · doi:10.1109/sp.2006.32 · Cited by 451
GENI - global environment for network innovations
Elliott, C. (2008) · 2008 33rd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) · doi:10.1109/lcn.2008.4664143 · Cited by 278
Research issues for privacy and security of electronic health services
Yüksel, B., Küpçü, A., & Özkasap, Ö. (2017) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.08.011 · Cited by 147
Semantic-based Automated Reasoning for AWS Access Policies using SMT
Backes, J., Bolignano, P., Cook, B., Dodge, C., Gacek, A., Luckow, K., Rungta, N., Tkachuk, O., & Varming, C. (2018) · 2018 Formal Methods in Computer Aided Design (FMCAD) · doi:10.23919/fmcad.2018.8602994 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, M. Y., & Sewell, P.
- Published
- 2004-06-28
- Pages
- 139-154
- OpenAlex
- W1749560176
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 60.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cassandra: flexible trust management, applied to electronic health records. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/csfw.2004.7
- The paper
- Becker, M. Y., & Sewell, P. (2004). Cassandra: flexible trust management, applied to electronic health records. https://doi.org/10.1109/csfw.2004.7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.