The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications
Abstract
Contextual integrity is a conceptual framework for understanding privacy expectations and their implications developed in the literature on law, public policy, and political philosophy. We formalize some aspects of contextual integrity in a logical framework for expressing and reasoning about norms of transmission of personal information. In comparison with access control and privacy policy frameworks such as RBAC, EPAL, and P3P, these norms focus on who personal information is about, how it is transmitted, and past and future actions by both the subject and the users of the information. Norms can be positive or negative depending on whether they refer to actions that are allowed or disallowed. Our model is expressive enough to capture naturally many notions of privacy found in legislation, including those found in HIPAA, COPPA, and GLBA. A number of important problems regarding compliance with privacy norms, future requirements associated with specific actions, and relations between policies and legal standards reduce to standard decision procedures for temporal logic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
k-ANONYMITY: A MODEL FOR PROTECTING PRIVACY
SWEENEY, L. (2002) · International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218488502001648 · Cited by 8,571
Spin model checker, the: primer and reference manual
Holzmann, G. J. (2003) · Cited by 2,009
Computer Security: Art and Science
Bishop, M. (2002) · Cited by 1,233
The Ponder Policy Specification Language
Damianou, N., Dulay, N., Lupu, E., & Sloman, M. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44569-2_2 · Cited by 1,213
The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics
Sistla, A. P., & Clarke, E. M. (1985) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3828.3837 · Cited by 1,095
Temporal Verification of Reactive Systems: Safety
Manna, Z., & Pnueli, A. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 947
The platform for privacy preferences
Reagle, J., & Cranor, L. F. (1999) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/293411.293455 · Cited by 716
Flexible support for multiple access control policies
Jajodia, S., Samarati, P., Sapino, M. L., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2001) · ACM Transactions on Database Systems · doi:10.1145/383891.383894 · Cited by 640
Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences
Ackerman, M. S., Cranor, L. F., & Reagle, J. (1999) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic commerce · doi:10.1145/336992.336995 · Cited by 528
The platform for privacy preferences 1.0 (p3p1.0) specification
Cranor, L. F., Langheinrich, M., Massimo Marchiori, B., & Presler-Marshall, M. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 513
Cited by
Lin (2012) · doi:10.1145/2370216.2370290 · Cited by 451
Consumer privacy and the future of data-based innovation and marketing
Bleier, A., Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.03.006 · Cited by 239
Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare
Avancha, S., Baxi, A., & Kotz, D. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2379776.2379779 · Cited by 229
Nicholas, J., Shilton, K., Schueller, S. M., Gray, E. L., Kwasny, M. J., & Mohr, D. C. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/12578 · Cited by 77
When Is an Algorithm Transparent? Predictive Analytics, Privacy, and Public Policy
Sloan, R. H., & Warner, R. (2018) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2701166 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Barth, A., Datta, A., Mitchell, J. C., & Nissenbaum, H.
- Venue
- 2006 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P'06)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 15 pp.-198
- ISSN
- 1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066266646
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 33.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sp.2006.32
- The paper
- Barth, A., Datta, A., Mitchell, J. C., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications. 2006 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P'06). https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.2006.32
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.