Systematic and Efficient Anomaly Detection Framework using Machine Learning on Public ICS Datasets
Abstract
Industrial Control Systems (ICSs) are used in several domains such as Transportation, Manufacturing, Defense and Power Generation and Distribution. ICSs deal with complex physical systems in order to achieve an industrial purpose with operational safety. Security has not been taken into account by design in these systems that makes them vulnerable to cyberattacks.In this paper, we rely on existing public ICS datasets as well as on the existing literature of Machine Learning (ML) applications for anomaly detection in ICSs in order to improve detection scores. To perform this purpose, we propose a systematic framework, relying on established ML algorithms and suitable data preprocessing methods, which allows us to quickly get efficient, and surprisingly, better results than the literature. Finally, some recommendations for future public ICS dataset generations end this paper, which would be fruitful for improving future attack detection models and then protect new ICSs designed in the next future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Millot et al. [129] used six public ICS datasets-Water Storage Tank, New Gas Pipeline, Power System, WADI, BATADAL, and Tennessee Eastman Process-and leveraged both cyber-layer data and physical-layer data.
“Using six public ICS datasetsWater Storage Tank, New Gas Pipeline, Power System, WADI, BATADAL, and Tennessee Eastman Process-the framework leverages both cyber-layer data (network traffic, IDS logs) and physical-layer data (sensor and process variables).”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [129]
In Millot et al. [129], WADI and Power System datasets, which include both network and physical signals, are used to validate multi-domain applicability.
“In particular, WADI and Power System datasets, which include both network and physical signals, are used to validate multi-domain applicability.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [129]
Millot et al. [129] presented a systematic and efficient anomaly detection framework that performs integrative analysis of multi-domain data.
“Millot et al. [129] presented a systematic and efficient anomaly detection framework that performs integrative analysis of multi-domain data.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [129]
Millot et al. [129]'s experimental results demonstrate consistently high detection accuracy (above 90%) across datasets and show that the framework significantly improves generalization and reproducibility compared to single-domain models.
“Experimental results demonstrate consistently high detection accuracy (above 90%) across datasets and show that the framework significantly improves generalization and reproducibility compared to single-domain models.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [129]
Millot et al. [129]'s pipeline combines data scaling and normalization, frequency smoothing, dimensionality reduction via PCA, and machine-learning classifiers to handle heterogeneous data structures in a unified manner.
“The pipeline combines data scaling and normalization, frequency smoothing, dimensionality reduction via PCA, and machine-learning classifiers (Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost, etc.) to handle heterogeneous data structures in a unified manner.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [129]
Many hybrid data fusion-based anomaly detection approaches explicitly synchronize cyber-layer events with physical-layer behavior on a common time axis to detect cyber-physical inconsistencies that single-domain detectors would miss.
“First, many approaches explicitly synchronize cyber-layer events with physical-layer behavior on a common time axis to detect cyber-physical inconsistencies that single-domain detectors would miss [122-129].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [129]
Several hybrid data fusion frameworks are designed to operate across multiple datasets and domains by providing generic pipelines for heterogeneous feature processing and multi-modal fusion, rather than redesigning ad hoc detectors for each individual system.
“Second, several frameworks are designed to operate across multiple datasets and domains by providing generic pipelines for heterogeneous feature processing and multi-modal fusion, rather than redesigning ad hoc detectors for each individual system [124,129,131].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [129]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Baptiste, M., Julien, F., & Franck, S.
- Affiliations
- Naval Group (France) (FR)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-07-26
- Pages
- 292-297
- OpenAlex
- W3197634927
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-AIRT-0008)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- industrial control systems, anomaly detection, data preprocessing, machine learning for security, operational safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review