The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigation of the Effectiveness of Applying ChatGPT in Dialogic Teaching of Electronic Information Using Electroencephalography
Abstract
In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, especially the emergence of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, has presented significant prospects for application in the field of education. LLMs possess the capability to interpret knowledge, answer questions, and consider context, thus providing support for dialogic teaching to students. Therefore, an examination of the capacity of LLMs to effectively fulfill instructional roles, thereby facilitating student learning akin to human educators within dialogic teaching scenarios, is an exceptionally valuable research topic. This research recruited 34 undergraduate students as participants, who were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group engaged in dialogic teaching using ChatGPT, while the control group interacted with human teachers. Both groups learned the histogram equalization unit in the information-related course “Digital Image Processing”. The research findings show comparable scores between the two groups on the retention test. However, students who engaged in dialogue with ChatGPT exhibited lower performance on the transfer test. Electroencephalography data revealed that students who interacted with ChatGPT exhibited higher levels of cognitive activity, suggesting that ChatGPT could help students establish a knowledge foundation and stimulate cognitive activity. However, its strengths on promoting students' knowledge application and creativity were insignificant.…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“GenAI has advanced the role of AI in dialogue-based applications [63].”
From When the source is a bot: How people adapt their evaluation strategies to assess AI-generated content (2026) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Summary of ChatGPT-Related research and perspective towards the future of large language models
Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., et al. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017 · Cited by 855
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1080/03054985.2014.934087 · DOI
- Asterhan, 2015, Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue[J], Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue, 1
- 2023, OpenAI R. Gpt-4 technical report. arxiv 2303.08774[J], View in Article, 2 · arXiv
- Pardos, 2023, Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints[J], arXiv preprint
- Lehnert, 2023, AI insights into theoretical physics and the Swampland Program: A journey through the cosmos with ChatGPT[J], arXiv preprint
- 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jcal.12375 · DOI · Paper page
- Likert, 1932, A technique for the measurement of attitudes[J], Archives of psychology
- 10.1023/B:BRAT.0000006333.93597.9d · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICASSDA.2018.8477604 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001756-199605170-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00056-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1948-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224 · Cited by 531
Dabran-Zivan, S., Klein-Avraham, I., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2026) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0345300 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Cai, W., Qi, S., Long, T., & Ge, B.
- Affiliations
- School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an,China
- School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an,China
- Ministry of Education Shaanxi Normal University,Key Laboratory of Modern, Teaching Technology,Xi'an,China
- Central China Normal University,Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education,Wuhan,China
- Venue
- 2024 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-04-19
- Pages
- 150-154
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61976131,62307017)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review