The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Edge detection and ridge detection with automatic scale selection
Open accessAbstract
When extracting features from image data, the type of information that can be extracted may be strongly dependent on the scales at which the feature detectors are applied. This article presents a systematic methodology for addressing this problem. A mechanism is presented for automatic selection of scale levels when detecting one-dimensional features, such as edges and ridges. A novel concept of a scale-space edge is introduced, defined as a connected set of points in scale-space at which: (i) the gradient magnitude assumes a local maximum in the gradient direction, and (ii) a normalized measure of the strength of the edge response is locally maximal over scales. An important property of this definition is that it allows the scale levels to vary along the edge. Two specific measures of edge strength are analysed in detail. It is shown that by expressing these in terms of /spl gamma/-normalized derivatives, an immediate consequence of this definition is that fine scales are selected for sharp edges (so as to reduce the shape distortions due to scale-space smoothing), whereas coarse scales are selected for diffuse edges, such that an edge model constitutes a valid abstraction of the intensity profile across the edge. With slight modifications, this idea can be used for formulating a ridge detector with automatic scale selection, having the characteristic property that the selected scales on a scale-space ridge instead reflect the width of the ridge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 · Cited by 6,510
Feature detection with automatic scale selection
Lindeberg, T. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008045108935 · Cited by 2,541
Self-citationKoenderink, J. J. (1984) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00336961 · Cited by 2,452
Cited by
Feature detection with automatic scale selection
Lindeberg, T. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008045108935 · Cited by 2,541
Self-citationSato, Y., Nakajima, S., Shiraga, N., Atsumi, H., Yoshida, S., Koller, T., Gerig, G., & Kikinis, R. (1998) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(98)80009-1 · Cited by 1,163
Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph Decomposition
Cour, T., Benezit, F., & Shi, J. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.332 · Cited by 586
Fast anisotropic gauss filtering
Geusebroek, J., Smeulders, A. W. M., & van de Weijer, J. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.812429 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindeberg, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 465-470
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123211807
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edge detection and ridge detection with automatic scale selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.1996.517113
- The paper
- Lindeberg, T. (1996). Edge detection and ridge detection with automatic scale selection. Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.1996.517113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.