Cited by 2,452Visual perception and processing mechanismsAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising Methods

The structure of images

Koenderink, Jan J.·1984·Biological Cybernetics

Abstract

In practice the relevant details of images exist only over a restricted range of scale. Hence it is important to study the dependence of image structure on the level of resolution. It seems clear enough that visual perception treats images on several levels of resolution simultaneously and that this fact must be important for the study of perception. However, no applicable mathematically formulated theory to deal with such problems appears to exist. In this paper it is shown that any image can be embedded in a one-parameter family of derived images (with resolution as the parameter) in essentially only one unique way if the constraint that no spurious detail should be generated when the resolution is diminished, is applied. The structure of this family is governed by the well known diffusion equation (a parabolic, linear, partial differential equation of the second order). As such the structure fits into existing theories that treat the front end of the visual system as a continuous stack of homogeneous layers, characterized by iterated local processing schemes. When resolution is decreased the images becomes less articulated because the extrem ("light and dark blobs") disappear one after the other. This erosion of structure is a simple process that is similar in every case. As a result any image can be described as a juxtaposed and nested set of light and dark blobs, wherein each blob has a limited range of resolution in which it manifests itself. The structure of the family of derived images permits a derivation of the sampling density required to sample the image at multiple scales of resolution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00336961

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gaussians are optimal for scale-space analysis.

    “Gaussians are optimal for scale-space analysis, as shown in [24].”

    From SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features (2006) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koenderink, J. J.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Koenderink, Jan J.
Venue
Biological Cybernetics
Published
1984-08
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
363-370
ISSN
  • 0340-1200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0770
OpenAlex
W2022735534
Cited by
2,452
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 107
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
image structure, resolution dependence, diffusion equation, multiscale image representation, sampling density, visual perception, image smoothing
MeSH terms
Cybernetics, Form Perception, Humans, Models, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review