Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 627

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliable feature matching across widely separated views

Baumberg, A.·2002·Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662)
DOI 10.1109/cvpr.2000.855899
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We present a robust method for automatically matching features in images corresponding to the same physical point on an object seen from two arbitrary viewpoints. Unlike conventional stereo matching approaches we assume no prior knowledge about the relative camera positions and orientations. In fact in our application this is the information we wish to determine from the image feature matches. Features are detected in two or more images and characterised using affine texture invariants. The problem of window effects is explicitly addressed by our method-our feature characterisation is invariant to linear transformations of the image data including rotation, stretch and skew. The feature matching process is optimised for a structure-from-motion application where we wish to ignore unreliable matches at the expense of reducing the number of feature matches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2000.855899

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. kadyrov, 1995, Computer Analysis of Image and Patterns
  2. 10.1007/978-1-4757-6465-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0262-8856(97)01144-X · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/BF01421488 · doi:10.1007/bf01421488
  5. 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710802 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/BFb0028347 · doi:10.1007/bfb0028347
  7. schalkoff, 1989, Digital Image Processing and Computer Vision
  8. 10.1109/34.589215 · DOI · Paper page
  9. tomasi, 1994, Good features to track, CVPR94, 593
  10. faugeras, 1993, Three-Dimensional Computer Vision
  11. falkenhagen, 1994, Image Processing for Broadcast and Video Production, 115
  12. 10.1016/0031-3203(93)90098-H · DOI · Paper page
  13. gruen, 1985, Adaptive least squares correlation: A powerful image matching technique, Jornal of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Cartography, 14, 175
  14. 10.5244/C.12.37 · doi:10.5244/c.12.37
  15. deriche, 1994, Robust recovery of the epipolar geometry for an uncalibrated stereo rig, ECCV94, a:567
  16. beardsley, 1996, 3d model acquisition from extended image sequences, ECCV, 2, 683
  17. xu, 1997, A unified approach to image matching and segmentation in stereo, motion, and object recognition via recovery of epipolar geometry, Videre, 1, 22

Cited by

See all 627

Metadata

Authors
Baumberg, A.
Venue
Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662)
Publisher
IEEE Comput. Soc
Published
2002-11-07
Volume
1
Pages
774-781
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/cvpr.2000.855899
OpenAlex
W2165497495
Cited by
627
References
3
FWCI
27.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliable feature matching across widely separated views. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2000.855899
The paper
Baumberg, A. (2002). Reliable feature matching across widely separated views. Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2000.855899

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.