The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient belief propagation for early vision
Abstract
Markov random field models provide a robust and unified framework for early vision problems such as stereo, optical flow and image restoration. Inference algorithms based on graph cuts and belief propagation yield accurate results, but despite recent advances are often still too slow for practical use. In this paper we present new algorithmic techniques that substantially improve the running time of the belief propagation approach. One of our techniques reduces the complexity of the inference algorithm to be linear rather than quadratic in the number of possible labels for each pixel, which is important for problems such as optical flow or image restoration that have a large label set. A second technique makes it possible to obtain good results with a small fixed number of message passing iterations, independent of the size of the input images. Taken together these techniques speed up the standard algorithm by several orders of magnitude. In practice we obtain stereo, optical flow and image restoration algorithms that are as accurate as other global methods (e.g., using the Middlebury stereo benchmark) while being as fast as local techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Cited by
Roth, S., & Black, M. J. (2009) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-008-0197-6 · Cited by 847
Deformable Model Fitting by Regularized Landmark Mean-Shift
Saragih, J. M., Lucey, S., & Cohn, J. F. (2011) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0380-4 · Cited by 787
FusionFlow: Discrete-continuous optimization for optical flow estimation
Lempitsky, V., Roth, S., & Rother, C. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587751 · Cited by 145
Improving Multiple Pedestrian Tracking by Track Management and Occlusion Handling
Stadler, D., & Beyerer, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01081 · Cited by 147
Optical flow estimation on coarse-to-fine region-trees using discrete optimization
Lei, C., & Yang, Y.-H. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459253 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Felzenszwalb, P. F., & Huttenlocher, D. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-11-12
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 261-268
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140200866
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient belief propagation for early vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315041
- The paper
- Felzenszwalb, P. F., & Huttenlocher, D. P. (2004). Efficient belief propagation for early vision. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.