Cited by 145Advanced Vision and ImagingVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsVideo Coding and Compression Technologies

FusionFlow: Discrete-continuous optimization for optical flow estimation

Lempitsky, Victor, Roth, Stefan, Rother, Carsten·2008·2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Accurate estimation of optical flow is a challenging task, which often requires addressing difficult energy optimization problems. To solve them, most top-performing methods rely on continuous optimization algorithms. The modeling accuracy of the energy in this case is often traded for its tractability. This is in contrast to the related problem of narrow-baseline stereo matching, where the top-performing methods employ powerful discrete optimization algorithms such as graph cuts and message-passing to optimize highly non-convex energies. In this paper, we demonstrate how similar non-convex energies can be formulated and optimized discretely in the context of optical flow estimation. Starting with a set of candidate solutions that are produced by fast continuous flow estimation algorithms, the proposed method iteratively fuses these candidate solutions by the computation of minimum cuts on graphs. The obtained continuous-valued fusion result is then further improved using local gradient descent. Experimentally, we demonstrate that the proposed energy is an accurate model and that the proposed discrete-continuous optimization scheme not only finds lower energy solutions than traditional discrete or continuous optimization techniques, but also leads to flow estimates that outperform the current state-of-the-art.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587751

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few algorithms (e.g., DPOF, Fusion, and Dynamic MRF) perform well in this region.

    “Only a few algorithms (e.g., DPOF-Lei and Yang 2009, Fusion-Lempitsky et al. 2008, and Dynamic MRF-Glocker et al. 2008) perform well in this region.”

    From A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow (2011) · cites this paper as Lempitsky et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lempitsky, V., Roth, S., & Rother, C.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Venue
2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2008-06
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157394577
Cited by
145
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
Keywords
optical flow, discrete-continuous optimization, minimum cut, graph cuts, energy modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review