The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning object detection from a small number of examples: the importance of good features
Abstract
Face detection systems have recently achieved high detection rates and real-time performance. However, these methods usually rely on a huge training database (around 5,000 positive examples for good performance). While such huge databases may be feasible for building a system that detects a single object, it is obviously problematic for scenarios where multiple objects (or multiple views of a single object) need to be detected. Indeed, even for multi-viewface detection the performance of existing systems is far from satisfactory. In this work we focus on the problem of learning to detect objects from a small training database. We show that performance depends crucially on the features that are used to represent the objects. Specifically, we show that using local edge orientation histograms (EOH) as features can significantly improve performance compared to the standard linear features used in existing systems. For frontal faces, local orientation histograms enable state of the art performance using only a few hundred training examples. For profile view faces, local orientation histograms enable learning a system that seems to outperform the state of the art in real-time systems even with a small number of training examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
Neural network-based face detection
Rowley, H. A., Baluja, S., & Kanade, T. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.655647 · Cited by 3,554
Cited by
Dollar, P., Tu, Z., Perona, P., & Belongie, S. (2009) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2009 · doi:10.5244/c.23.91 · Cited by 1,237
Real-Time Tracking via On-line Boosting
Grabner, H., Grabner, M., & Bischof, H. (2006) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2006 · doi:10.5244/c.20.6 · Cited by 1,198
Person Re-identification by Descriptive and Discriminative Classification
Hirzer, M., Beleznai, C., Roth, P. M., & Bischof, H. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21227-7_9 · Cited by 961
Human detection using depth information by Kinect
Xia, L., Chen, C.-C., & Aggarwal, J. K. (2011) · CVPR 2011 WORKSHOPS · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2011.5981811 · Cited by 503
Direct face detection and video reconstruction from event cameras
Miyatani, Y., Barua, S., & Veeraraghavan, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv.2016.7477561 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Levi, K., & Weiss, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-11-12
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 53-60
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120907774
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning object detection from a small number of examples: the importance of good features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315144
- The paper
- Levi, K., & Weiss, Y. (2004). Learning object detection from a small number of examples: the importance of good features. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.