Cited by 1,198Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

Real-Time Tracking via On-line Boosting

Grabner, H., Grabner, M., Bischof, H.·2006·Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2006

Abstract

Very recently tracking was approached using classification techniques such as support vector machines. The object to be tracked is discriminated by a classifier from the background. In a similar spirit we propose a novel on-line AdaBoost feature selection algorithm for tracking. The distinct advantage of our method is its capability of on-line training. This allows to adapt the classifier while tracking the object. Therefore appearance changes of the object (e.g. out of plane rotations, illumination changes) are handled quite naturally. Moreover, depending on the background the algorithm selects the most discriminating features for tracking resulting in stable tracking results. By using fast computable features (e.g. Haar-like wavelets, orientation histograms, local binary patterns) the algorithm runs in real-time. We demonstrate the performance of the algorithm on several (publically available) video sequences. 1

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5244/c.20.6

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, more tracking source codes have been made publicly available, e.g., the OAB, IVT, MIL, L1, and TLD algorithms, which have been commonly used for evaluation.

    “Recently, more tracking source codes have been made publicly available, e.g., the OAB [22], IVT [47], MIL [5], L1 [40], and TLD [31] algorithms, which have been commonly used for evaluation.”

    From Object Tracking Benchmark (2015) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grabner, H., Grabner, M., & Bischof, H.
Venue
Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2006
Published
2006
Pages
6.1-6.10
OpenAlex
W2000326692
Cited by
1,198
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 127 · 2016: 147 · 2015: 143 · 2014: 144 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 58
FWCI
9.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
object tracking, feature selection, real-time tracking, background discrimination, appearance changes, orientation histograms, local binary pattern

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review