The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sharing features: efficient boosting procedures for multiclass object detection
Abstract
We consider the problem of detecting a large number of different object classes in cluttered scenes. Traditional approaches require applying a battery of different classifiers to the image, which can be slow and require much training data. We present a multi-class boosting procedure (joint boosting) that reduces both the computational and sample complexity, by finding common features that can be shared across the classes. The detectors for each class are trained jointly, rather than independently. For a given performance level, the total number of features required is observed to scale approximately logarithmically with the number of classes. In addition, we find that the features selected by independently trained classifiers are often specific to the class, whereas the features selected by the jointly trained classifiers are more generic features, such as lines and edges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1016218223 · Cited by 6,884
Caruana, R. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007379606734 · Cited by 6,636
A Trainable System for Object Detection
Papageorgiou, C., & Poggio, T. (2000) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008162616689 · Cited by 1,289
Cited by
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Self-citationOne-shot learning of object categories
Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.79 · Cited by 3,029
Describing objects by their attributes
Farhadi, A., Endres, I., Hoiem, D., & Forsyth, D. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206772 · Cited by 1,917
Robust Object Recognition with Cortex-Like Mechanisms
Serre, T., Wolf, L., Bileschi, S., Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.56 · Cited by 1,667
Classification using intersection kernel support vector machines is efficient
Maji, S., Berg, A. C., & Malik, J. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587630 · Cited by 940
Metadata
- Authors
- Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-11-12
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 762-769
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171188998
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sharing features: efficient boosting procedures for multiclass object detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315241
- The paper
- Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2004). Sharing features: efficient boosting procedures for multiclass object detection. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
