Cited by 6,636Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and AlgorithmsReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Multitask Learning

Open access
Caruana, Rich·1997·Machine Learning

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007379606734

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are two main goals in continual learning: maintaining stability and maintaining plasticity.

    “There are two main goals in continual learning: maintaining stability and maintaining plasticity88–91.”

    From Loss of plasticity in deep continual learning (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

    Section 4.6, “Sequential Transfer” (page unavailable), describes avoiding the forgetting of old tasks while learning new ones, which speaks to both concerns. It does not state that maintaining stability and plasticity are the two main goals of continual learning. (LLM, conf=0.71)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pretraining followed by task-specific fine-tuning can improve generalization.

    “pretraining followed by task-specific fine-tuning can improve generalization (Caruana, 1997)”

    From Masked Autoencoder Pretraining on Strong-Lensing Images for Joint Dark-Matter Model Classification and Super-Resolution (2025) · cites this paper as Caruana, 1997

    Section 1.4 (page unavailable) says inductive transfer can improve generalization, and Section 6 reports improved generalization from a serial transfer method. But the paper’s own method learns related tasks in parallel; it does not establish that pretraining followed by task-specific fine-tuning improves generalization. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A common representation of lensing data can benefit various tasks.

    “These studies hint that a common representation of lensing data can benefit various tasks”

    From Masked Autoencoder Pretraining on Strong-Lensing Images for Joint Dark-Matter Model Classification and Super-Resolution (2025) · cites this paper as Caruana, 1997

    Section 3.2.1 explains that related tasks can benefit from learning a shared feature, and Section 3.2.4 describes a preference for shared hidden-layer representations. The paper does not study lensing data, so it supports the general multitask-learning idea but not its lensing-specific application. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multi-task learning of related tasks could improve generalization capability by suppressing the shared encoder from learning task-specific features.

    “The motivation for the proposed architecture is that the multi-task learning (Caruana, 1997) of related tasks could improve the generalization capability by suppressing the shared encoder from learning any taskspecific features.”

    From Robust multi-task learning and online refinement for spacecraft pose estimation across domain gap (2024) · cites this paper as Caruana, 1997

    The Abstract says multitask learning can improve generalization by learning related tasks with a shared representation, and §3.2.4 says it biases learning toward representations useful to multiple tasks. But the paper does not say the shared hidden layer is prevented from learning any task-specific features; its Additional information says the networks in those experiments were not forced to share hidden-layer representations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inspired by Caruana, they employed shared layers to extract hidden features of different battery states and task-specific layers to achieve accurate multi-state monitoring.

    “Inspired by Caruana, they employed shared layers to extract hidden features of different battery states and task-specific layers to achieve accurate multi-state monitoring[110].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Abu-Mostafa, Y. S. (1995). "Hints," Neural Computation, 7, pp. 639-671.
  2. Caruana, R. (1994)."Multitask Connectionist Learning," Proceedings of the 1993 Connectionist Models Summer School, pp. 372-379.
  3. Caruana, R. (1997). "Multitask Learning," Ph.D. Thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
  4. de Sa, V. R. (1994). "Learning Classification with Unlabelled Data," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6, (Proceedings of NIPS-93), pp. 112-119.
  5. Liu, H. & Setiono, R. (1996). "A Probibilistic Approach to Feature Selection-A Filter Solution," Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML-96, Bari, Italy, pp. 319-327.
  6. Martin, J. D. (1994). "Goal-directed Clustering," Proceedings of the 1994 AAAI Spring Symposium on Goal- directed Learning.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caruana, R.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Caruana, Rich
Venue
Machine Learning
Published
1997-07
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
41-75
ISSN
  • 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0565
OpenAlex
W2913340405
Cited by
6,636
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 532 · 2025: 617 · 2024: 510 · 2023: 505 · 2022: 565 · 2021: 803 · 2020: 767 · 2019: 563 · 2018: 323 · 2017: 259 · 2016: 188 · 2015: 151 · 2014: 124 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 136
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9315428)
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
multi-task learning, inductive transfer, inductive bias, shared representations, task relatedness, k-nearest neighbors, kernel regression, case-based learning, decision tree

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review