The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up Segmentation
Abstract
In this work we show how to combine bottom-up and top-down approaches into a single figure-ground segmentation process. This process provides accurate delineation of object boundaries that cannot be achieved by either the top-down or bottom-up approach alone. The top-down approach uses object representation learned from examples to detect an object in a given input image and provide an approximation to its figure-ground segmentation. The bottom-up approach uses image-based criteria to define coherent groups of pixels that are likely to belong together to either the figure or the background part. The combination provides a final segmentation that draws on the relative merits of both approaches: The result is as close as possible to the top-down approximation, but is also constrained by the bottom-up process to be consistent with significant image discontinuities. We construct a global cost function that represents these top-down and bottom-up requirements. We then show how the global minimum of this function can be efficiently found by applying the sum-product algorithm. This algorithm also provides a confidence map that can be used to identify image regions where additional top-down or bottom-up information may further improve the segmentation. Our experiments show that the results derived from the algorithm are superior to results given by a pure top-down or pure bottom-up approach. The scheme has broad applicability, enabling the combined use of a range of existing bottom-up and top-down segmentations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm
Kschischang, F. R., Frey, B. J., & Loeliger, H.-A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.910572 · Cited by 6,486 · cited 2×
“A full description of the general algorithm can be found in [16].”
Background
Cited by
Training restricted Boltzmann machines using approximations to the likelihood gradient
Tieleman, T. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390290 · Cited by 837
Auto-Context and Its Application to High-Level Vision Tasks and 3D Brain Image Segmentation
Tu, Z., & Bai, X. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.186 · Cited by 578
Image Segmentation with Cascaded Hierarchical Models and Logistic Disjunctive Normal Networks
Seyedhosseini, M., Sajjadi, M., & Tasdizen, T. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.269 · Cited by 95
The Shape Boltzmann Machine: A strong model of object shape
Eslami, S. M. A., Heess, N., & Winn, J. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247702 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Borenstein, E., Sharon, E., & Ullman, S.
- Venue
- 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005-04-05
- Pages
- 46-46
- OpenAlex
- W2159372453
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2004.314
- The paper
- Borenstein, E., Sharon, E., & Ullman, S. (2005). Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up Segmentation. 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2004.314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.