The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shape Matching and Object Recognition Using Low Distortion Correspondences
Abstract
We approach recognition in the framework of deformable shape matching, relying on a new algorithm for finding correspondences between feature points. This algorithm sets up correspondence as an integer quadratic programming problem, where the cost function has terms based on similarity of corresponding geometric blur point descriptors as well as the geometric distortion between pairs of corresponding feature points. The algorithm handles outliers, and thus enables matching of exemplars to query images in the presence of occlusion and clutter. Given the correspondences, we estimate an aligning transform, typically a regularized thin plate spline, resulting in a dense correspondence between the two shapes. Object recognition is then handled in a nearest neighbor framework where the distance between exemplar and query is the matching cost between corresponding points. We show results on two datasets. One is the Caltech 101 dataset (Fei-Fei, Fergus and Perona), an extremely challenging dataset with large intraclass variation. Our approach yields a 48% correct classification rate, compared to Fei-Fei et al 's 16%. We also show results for localizing frontal and profile faces that are comparable to special purpose approaches tuned to faces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2007) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2005.09.012 · Cited by 2,359
A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration
Chui, H., & Rangarajan, A. (2003) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/s1077-3142(03)00009-2 · Cited by 1,560
The Representation and Matching of Pictorial Structures
Fischler, M. A., & Elschlager, R. A. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/t-c.1973.223602 · Cited by 1,322
Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification
Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., & Sali, E. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn870 · Cited by 600
Cited by
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
One-shot learning of object categories
Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.79 · Cited by 3,029
Locality-constrained Linear Coding for image classification
Wang, J., Yang, J., Yu, K., Lv, F., Huang, T., & Gong, Y. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540018 · Cited by 3,100
Lee, H., Grosse, R., Ranganath, R., & Ng, A. Y. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553453 · Cited by 2,412
What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M. A., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459469 · Cited by 2,153
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, A. C., Berg, T. L., & Malik, J.
- Venue
- 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005-07-27
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168002178
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 47.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
