The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph Decomposition
Abstract
We present a multiscale spectral image segmentation algorithm. In contrast to most multiscale image processing, this algorithm works on multiple scales of the image in parallel, without iteration, to capture both coarse and fine level details. The algorithm is computationally efficient, allowing to segment large images. We use the normalized cut graph partitioning framework of image segmentation. We construct a graph encoding pairwise pixel affinity, and partition the graph for image segmentation. We demonstrate that large image graphs can be compressed into multiple scales capturing image structure at increasingly large neighborhood. We show that the decomposition of the image segmentation graph into different scales can be determined by ecological statistics on the image grouping cues. Our segmentation algorithm works simultaneously across the graph scales, with an inter-scale constraint to ensure communication and consistency between the segmentations at each scale. As the results show, we incorporate long-range connections with linear-time complexity, providing high-quality segmentations efficiently. Images that previously could not be processed because of their size have been accurately segmented thanks to this method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Cited by
80 Million Tiny Images: A Large Data Set for Nonparametric Object and Scene Recognition
Torralba, A., Fergus, R., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.128 · Cited by 1,921
Convolutional Networks Can Learn to Generate Affinity Graphs for Image Segmentation
Turaga, S. C., Murray, J. F., Jain, V., Roth, F., Helmstaedter, M., Briggman, K., Denk, W., & Seung, H. S. (2010) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2009.10-08-881 · Cited by 376
Recovering Occlusion Boundaries from a Single Image
Hoiem, D., Stein, A. N., Efros, A. A., & Hebert, M. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4408985 · Cited by 206
Crisp Boundary Detection Using Pointwise Mutual Information
Isola, P., Zoran, D., Krishnan, D., & Adelson, E. H. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_52 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Cour, T., Benezit, F., & Shi, J.
- Venue
- 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005-07-27
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 1124-1131
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097323414
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.